首页> 外文期刊>Concurrency and Computation >Comparing the performance of MPICH with Cray's MPI and with SGI's MPI
【24h】

Comparing the performance of MPICH with Cray's MPI and with SGI's MPI

机译:比较MPICH与Cray的MPI和SGI的MPI的性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this paper is to compare the performance of MPICH with the vendor Message Passing Interface (MPI) on a Cray T3E-900 and an SGI Origin 3000. Seven basic communication tests which include basic point-to-point and collective MPI communication routines were chosen to represent commonly-used communication patterns. Cray's MPI performed better (and sometimes significantly better) than Mississippi State University's (MSU's) MPICH for small and medium messages. They both performed about the same for large messages, however for three tests MSU's MPICH was about 20% faster than Cray's MPI. SGI's MPI performed and scaled better (and sometimes significantly better) than MPICH for all messages, except for the scatter test where MPICH outperformed SGI's MPI for 1 kbyte messages. The poor scalability of MPICH on the Origin 3000 suggests there may be scalability problems with MPICH.
机译:本文的目的是比较Cray T3E-900和SGI Origin 3000上MPICH与供应商消息传递接口(MPI)的性能。七个基本通信测试,包括基本的点对点和集体MPI通信例程选择以代表常用的通信模式。 Cray的MPI在中小型邮件方面的表现优于密西西比州立大学(MSU)的MPICH。对于大型邮件,它们的性能几乎相同,但是在三项测试中,MSU的MPICH比Cray的MPI快20%。对于所有消息,SGI的MPI的性能和扩展性都比MPICH更好(有时甚至更好),除了分散测试(MPICH在1 KB消息方面胜过SGI的MPI)。 Origin 3000上MPICH的可伸缩性较差,这表明MPICH可能存在可伸缩性问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号