...
首页> 外文期刊>Computers, Materials & Continua >Evaluating Water Vapor Permeance Measurement Techniques for Highly Permeable Membranes
【24h】

Evaluating Water Vapor Permeance Measurement Techniques for Highly Permeable Membranes

机译:评价高渗透膜的水蒸气渗透率测量技术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The cup method and dynamic moisture permeation cell (DMPC) method are two common techniques used to determine the water vapor permeation properties of a membrane. Often, ignoring the resistance of boundary air layers to the transport of water vapor results in the water vapor permeance of the membrane being underestimated in practical tests. The measurement errors are higher with highly permeable membranes. In this study, the two methods were simulated using COMSOL Multiphysics platform and the extent of the error was evaluated. Initial results showed that the error is equally high in both methods. With the correction for the still air gap, the cup method produces a relatively reduced error. In the DMPC method, reducing the error caused by the boundary air layer by increasing the sweep speed can produce higher instrument error. Highly accurate and precise instrument is needed for DMPC method; however, its error is still higher than that in the cup method. Simulations also show that lowering the test pressure is favorable to both methods.
机译:杯法和动态水分渗透池(DMPC)方法是用于确定膜的水蒸气渗透特性的两种常用技术。通常,忽略边界空气层对水蒸气传输的阻力会导致膜的水蒸气渗透率在实际测试中被低估。高渗透膜的测量误差更高。在这项研究中,使用COMSOL Multiphysics平台对这两种方法进行了仿真,并评估了误差的程度。初步结果表明,两种方法的误差均很高。通过对静止气隙的校正,杯形法产生了相对减少的误差。在DMPC方法中,通过提高扫描速度来减少由边界空气层引起的误差会产生更高的仪器误差。 DMPC方法需要高度精确的仪器;但是,其误差仍高于杯法。仿真还表明,降低测试压力对两种方法均有利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号