首页> 外文期刊>Computers in Human Behavior >E-negotiation versus face-to-face negotiation what has changed - if anything?
【24h】

E-negotiation versus face-to-face negotiation what has changed - if anything?

机译:电子谈判与面对面谈判发生了什么变化-如果有的话?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The focus of the present study is the relatively new and still controversial electronically mediated negotiation (hence denoted e-negotiation) as compared to the good old face-to-face negotiations. The main research question is the impact that the type of negotiation media (face-to-face versus e-negotiation) has on the features of the negotiation process (duration and tactics) and on its outcomes. It also examines the moderation effects of the sequence of the negotiation media, i.e., face-to-face negotiation, when carried out prior to, or after e-negotiation. For this purpose, 80 young students were exposed to the two types of negotiations, whilst various intervening variables were controlled by randomization. It was found that the negotiation media, as well as the negotiation sequence, barely affects the negotiation outcomes. Face-to-face negotiation was not different than e-negotiation, in terms of the final price, the number of installments for the balance and the sum of the advanced payment. However, both the negotiation media and the negotiation sequence significantly affected the main features of the negotiation process, in terms of time duration and the use of hard or soft tactics. These results are discussed and interpreted in terms of existing theories.
机译:与良好的旧式面对面谈判相比,本研究的重点是相对较新且仍存在争议的电子媒介谈判(因此称为电子谈判)。主要的研究问题是谈判媒介的类型(面对面与电子谈判)对谈判过程的特征(持续时间和策略)及其结果产生的影响。它还检查了在电子协商之前或之后进行协商时,协商媒体序列(即面对面协商)的适度效果。为此,使80名年轻学生参加了两种类型的谈判,而各种干预变量则由随机控制。结果发现,协商媒介以及协商顺序对协商结果几乎没有影响。就最终价格,余额的分期付款数量和预付款总额而言,面对面谈判与电子谈判没有什么不同。但是,无论是协商媒体还是协商顺序,都在持续时间以及使用硬性或软性策略方面显着影响了协商过程的主要特征。这些结果将根据现有理论进行讨论和解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号