首页> 外文期刊>Computers in Human Behavior >Images in computer-supported learning: Increasing their benefits for metacomprehension through judgments of learning
【24h】

Images in computer-supported learning: Increasing their benefits for metacomprehension through judgments of learning

机译:图像在计算机支持的学习中:通过学习判断增加元理解的益处

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Images are widely used in computer-based learning although they might bias learners' judgments on how well they have mastered the material, which might reduce the effectiveness of metacognitive learning control. As that bias seems to result from primarily theory-based processing, we used two-step judgments of learning to induce more experience-based processes that we hypothesized to benefit metacomprehension accuracy. In Experiment 1, 381 participants studied a ten-section text on team building that was either accompanied by conceptual images, decorative images, or no images. Half of the participants made simple judgments by rating after each section the likelihood of correctly answering a knowledge question on that section (judgment of learning; JOL) The other half made combined judgments by rating text difficulty before making a JOL. As postulated, combined JOL benefitted accuracy and knowledge test scores; both were highest in the conceptual images group. In Experiment 2, to further increase accuracy, we manipulated judgment scope. Rather than predicting answers correct for an entire chapter, another 310 participants had to predict answers correct for a specific concept from a chapter. Again, accuracy and test scores were highest in the conceptual images group. Contrary to expectations, however, JOL accuracy did not benefit from term-specific judgments. We discuss implications for research into metacomprehension processes in computer-supported learning and for adaptive learner support based on judgment prompts. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:图像被广泛用于基于计算机的学习中,尽管它们可能会使学习者对他们对材料的掌握程度产生偏见,这可能会降低元认知学习控制的有效性。由于这种偏见似乎主要来自于基于理论的处理,因此我们使用了学习的两步判断来诱导更多基于经验的过程,我们认为这些过程将有益于元理解的准确性。在实验1中,有381名参与者研究了关于团队建设的十节文字,其中附有概念性图像,装饰性图像或无图像。一半的参与者通过在每个部分之后对在该部分上正确回答知识问题的可能性进行评分来做出简单的判断(判断;学习; JOL);另一半的参与者在做出JOL之前通过对文本难度进行评分来进行综合判断。根据推测,合并的JOL有助于提高准确性和知识测验分数;两者均在概念图像组中最高。在实验2中,为了进一步提高准确性,我们操纵了判断范围。而不是预测整个章节正确的答案,另外310名参与者必须预测章节中针对特定概念的正确答案。同样,准确性和测试分数在概念图像组中最高。然而,与期望相反,JOL准确性并未从针对特定术语的判断中受益。我们讨论了对计算机支持的学习中的元理解过程的研究以及基于判断提示的自适应学习者支持的意义。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号