首页> 外文期刊>Computer law & security report >Are 'pseudonymised' data always personal data? Implications of the GDPR for administrative data research in the UK
【24h】

Are 'pseudonymised' data always personal data? Implications of the GDPR for administrative data research in the UK

机译:“假名”数据是否总是个人数据? GDPR对英国行政数据研究的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There has naturally been a good deal of discussion of the forthcoming General Data Protection Regulation. One issue of interest to all data controllers, and of particular concern for researchers, is whether the GDPR expands the scope of personal data through the introduction of the term 'pseudonymisation' in Article 4(5). If all data which have been 'pseudonymised' in the conventional sense of the word (e.g. key-coded) are to be treated as personal data, this would have serious implications for research. Administrative data research, which is carried out on data routinely collected and held by public authorities, would be particularly affected as the sharing of de-identified data could constitute the unconsented disclosure of identifiable information.
机译:对于即将发布的《通用数据保护条例》自然进行了大量讨论。所有数据控制者关心的一个问题,也是研究人员特别关注的一个问题是,GDPR是否通过在第4条第5款中引入“假名”一词来扩展个人数据的范围。如果将所有在常规意义上已被“假名”化的数据(例如密钥编码)都视为个人数据,这将对研究产生严重影响。行政数据研究是对公共机构常规收集和保存的数据进行的,因为共享未识别的数据可能会构成未经许可的可识别信息披露,因此特别受到影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号