首页> 外文期刊>Composite Structures >A new method for simultaneous material and topology optimization of composite laminate structures using Hyperbolic Function Parametrization
【24h】

A new method for simultaneous material and topology optimization of composite laminate structures using Hyperbolic Function Parametrization

机译:双曲函数参数化复合层压结构的同步材料和拓扑优化的一种新方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper presents a new discrete parametrization method for simultaneous topology and material optimization of composite laminate structures, referred to as Hyperbolic Function Parametrization (HFP). The novelty of HFP is the way the candidate materials are parametrized in the optimization problem. In HFP, a filtering technique based on hyperbolic functions is used, such that only one design variable is used for any given number of material candidates. Compared to state-of-the-art methods such Discrete Material and Topology Optimization (DMTO) and Shape Function with Penalization (SFP), HFP has much fewer optimization variables and constraints but introduces additional non-linearity in the optimization problems. A comparative analysis of HFP, DMTO and SFP are performed based on the problem of maximizing the stiffness of composite plates under a total volume constraint and multiple manufacturing constraints using various loads, boundary conditions and input parameters. The comparison shows that all three methods are highly sensitive to the choice of input parameters for the optimization problem, although the performance of HFP is overall more consistent. HFP method performs similarly to DMTO and SFP in terms of the designs obtained and computational cost. However, HFP obtains similar or better objective function values compared to the DMTO and SFP methods.
机译:本文提出了一种新的离散参数化方法,用于同时拓扑结构和材料优化的复合层压结构,称为双曲函数参数化(HFP)。 HFP的新颖性是候选材料在优化问题中参数化的方式。在HFP中,使用基于双曲函数的过滤技术,使得只有一个设计变量用于任何给定数量的材料候选。与最先进的方法相比,这种离散的材料和拓扑优化(DMTO)和诸多惩罚(SFP)的形状功能,HFP具有更少的优化变量和约束,但在优化问题中引入了额外的非线性度。基于使用各种负载,边界条件和输入参数的总体积约束和多种制造约束在总体积约束和多种制造约束下最大化复合板刚度的问题进行HFP,DMTO和SFP的比较分析。比较表明,所有三种方法对优化问题的输入参数的选择非常敏感,尽管HFP的性能更加一致。 HFP方法在获得的设计和计算成本方面类似于DMTO和SFP执行。然而,与DMTO和SFP方法相比,HFP获得了类似或更好的客观函数值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号