首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Network Industries >LIBERALISATION VERSUS NATIONAL PROTECTIONISM The European liberalised Postal market: Finalisation by whom?
【24h】

LIBERALISATION VERSUS NATIONAL PROTECTIONISM The European liberalised Postal market: Finalisation by whom?

机译:自由化与国家保护主义欧洲自由化的邮政市场:由谁完成?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The new European Postal Directive of 2008 provides the postal market with new opportunities as it allows for the gradual development of competition of services of general interests in Europe. However, the directive leaves room for uncertainties and the full opening of the postal market is hampered by a number of existing and emerging barriers. Thus the European Commission is handling complaints about state aid which is granted to national postal services in order to facilitate their role as service of national interest. Much harder to challenge are a number of "de facto barriers" which fall outside competition law. Currently, the infringement procedure is the aggressive weapon against Member States contravening the Treaty. However, this procedure does not offer an overall solution to remove all trade barriers especially the "de facto barriers". In contrast, the Open Method of Co-ordination could be used to set policy and norms for the postal market. These could serve as best practices to manage the postal market by objectives rather than through enforceable laws.
机译:2008年新的《欧洲邮政指令》为邮政市场提供了新的机遇,因为它允许逐步发展具有欧洲共同利益的服务竞争。但是,该指令为不确定性留下了空间,邮政市场的全面开放受到许多现有和新兴障碍的阻碍。因此,欧洲委员会正在处理有关给予国家邮政服务的国家援助的投诉,以促进其为国家利益服务。更加难以挑战的是竞争法之外的许多“事实上的障碍”。目前,侵权程序是对违反该条约的成员国的侵略性武器。但是,该程序并不能提供消除所有贸易壁垒,特别是“事实上的壁垒”的整体解决方案。相反,开放式协调方法可用于为邮政市场设定政策和规范。这些可以作为通过目标而非通过可执行法律来管理邮政市场的最佳实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号