首页> 外文期刊>Communications >Native and embedded advertising formats: Tensions between a lucrative marketing strategy and consumer fairness
【24h】

Native and embedded advertising formats: Tensions between a lucrative marketing strategy and consumer fairness

机译:本机和嵌入式广告格式:利润丰厚的营销策略与消费者公平之间的紧张局势

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Taken together, this special issue illustrates the multitude of perspectives when it comes to native advertising, some of them conflicting, some of them congruent. Most research in the field of advertising and content marketing, however, has primarily looked at the consumer's perspective, for instance, by examining the effects of native advertising on advertising outcomes (e. g., Djafarova and Rush-worth, 2017; Evans et al., 2017). However, such a view remains inconclusive if it is not embedded in a broader understanding of why and how native advertising works. As our special issue demonstrates, marketing success and consumer fairness are not necessarily mutually exclusive when it comes to native advertising. Native advertising, no doubt, is a successful marketing strategy (e. g., Mayrhofer et al., 2020). However, there are clear red lines, ethical and legal, and empirical research is called to ask and address questions around those red lines. This will inform the debate by not only helping marketers to understand how they can craft successful native advertising messages but also by helping them to better understand the potentially problematic consequences of their actions. Likewise, research should be designed to yield results which can then be used to (better) inform consumers about the scope and power of native advertising in order to empower the members of the audience to maintain, and to regain, their independence. Marketing effectiveness and consumer fairness should therefore be considered comprehensively and equally in future research. That is, studies from the marketers' perspective are called on to take the notion of consumer fairness into account. By the same token, scholars focusing on consumer rights should not completely deny the legitimate aim of marketers to influence consumers. Still, the tension between marketing success and consumer fairness is not easy to resolve. Yet, we hope that this special issue can be a small piece in this complex puzzle.
机译:在一起,这一特殊问题说明了涉及到本土广告的众多观点,其中一些相互冲突,其中一些人一致。然而,广告和内容营销领域的大多数研究主要看着消费者的观点,例如,通过检查本土广告对广告结果的影响(例如,Djafarova和Rush-Protver,2017;埃文斯等人, 2017)。然而,如果它没有嵌入更广泛的理解,这种观点仍然是不确定的,因为对原始广告作品的为什么和如何以及如何。由于我们的特殊问题表明,营销成功和消费者公平在本土广告方面不一定相互排斥。毫无疑问,本土广告是一个成功的营销策略(例如,Mayrhofer等,2020)。但是,有明确的红线,道德和法律,并要求实证研究询问和解决这些红线周围的问题。这将不仅通过帮助营销人员了解他们如何制作成功的本土广告信息,而且通过帮助他们更好地理解其行为的可能有问题的后果来告知辩论。同样,研究应该旨在屈服于屈服于(更好)的结果,以便为消费者提供本机广告的范围和力量,以便授权观众的成员维护,并重新获得他们的独立性。因此,在未来的研究中,营销效率和消费者公平应全面地思考。也就是说,从营销人员的角度来看,呼吁将消费者公平的概念视为考虑。由同样的令牌,专注于消费者权利的学者不应完全否认营销人员影响消费者的合法目标。尽管如此,营销成功与消费者公平之间的紧张关系并不容易解决。然而,我们希望这个特殊问题可以是这个复杂的拼图中的一小块。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Communications》 |2020年第3期|273-281|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Media and Communication Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich;

    Corporate Communication Research Group Department of Communication University of Vienna Vienna Austria;

    Advertising and Media Effects Research Group Department of Communication University of Vienna Vienna Austria;

    Corporate Communication Research Group Department of Communication University of Vienna Vienna Austria;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号