首页> 外文期刊>Communication Theory >Motives and Communibiology's Texts: Whose Motives?
【24h】

Motives and Communibiology's Texts: Whose Motives?

机译:动机和社区生物学的文本:谁的动机?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The motive analysis included in Nelson's (2004) textual critique of the writings regarding communibiology is examined and found erroneous. It is suggested that the claim that traditional genre theories are contradicted by this analysis is not justified. The motives for communibiological texts alleged by Nelson are seen as preempted by the (conscious or nonconscious) motives of the critic.
机译:纳尔逊(2004)的文本评论中关于通讯学的著作中的动机分析被检查并发现是错误的。有人认为这种说法与传统体裁理论相矛盾的说法是没有道理的。评论家的(有意识的或无意识的)动机将纳尔逊所指称的交流文本的动机视为先发制人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号