首页> 外文期刊>Combustion and Flame >Liftoff and extinction characteristics of fuel- and air-stream-diluted methane-air flames
【24h】

Liftoff and extinction characteristics of fuel- and air-stream-diluted methane-air flames

机译:燃料和气流稀释的甲烷-空气火焰的升起和熄灭特性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Partial premixing of fuel and oxidizer is of common occurrence in fires. However, most previous studies dealing with flame extinction have focused on nonpremixed flames. In this experimental-numerical study, we examine the effectiveness of fuel-stream versus air-stream dilution for extinguishing laminar methane-air partially premixed (PPFs) and nonpremixed flames (NPF) using the chemically inert fire suppressant CO_2. Experimental measurements were made in lifted methane-air coflow flames, while both counterflow and coflow flames were simulated using a time-accurate implicit algorithm that incorporates detailed chemistry and includes radiation effects. Both measurements and simulations show that with fuel-stream dilution, PPFs stabilize at a higher liftoff height and blow out at a lower CO_2 dilution than NPFs. In contrast, with air-stream dilution, NPFs move to a higher liftoff height and blow out at a lower CO_2 dilution than PPFs. Despite different configurations, there is remarkable similarity in the extinction characteristics of coflow and counterflow flames with regard to the level of partial premixing and air- and fuel-stream dilution. The critical fuel-stream CO_2 mole fraction required for the extinction of both counterflow and coflow flames increases as φ is increased, i.e., as the level of partial premixing is reduced. Conversely, the critical air-stream CO_2 mole fraction decreases as φ is increased. Results also indicate a crossover value of φ ≈ 2.0, corresponding to the stoichiometric mixture fraction of f_s = 0.5, such that flames (including NPFs) with f_s < 0.5 are more difficult to extinguish with fuel-stream dilution, since oxygen is the deficient re-actant, whereas flames with f_s > 0.5 are more difficult to extinguish with air-stream dilution, since fuel is the deficient reactant for these flames.
机译:在火灾中,经常会发生燃料和氧化剂的部分预混合。但是,大多数有关熄灭火焰的研究都集中在非预混火焰上。在这项实验数字研究中,我们研究了使用化学惰性灭火剂CO_2来消除层流甲烷-空气部分预混(PPF)和非预混火焰(NPF)的燃料流与空气流稀释的有效性。实验测量是在抬升的甲烷-空气同流火焰中进行的,而逆流火焰和同流火焰都使用了时间精确的隐式算法进行了模拟,该算法结合了详细的化学反应并包括辐射效应。测量和模拟均显示,与NPF相比,PPF在燃料流稀释时稳定在较高的升空高度,并在CO_2稀释较低时吹出。相反,与PPF相比,使用气流稀释时,NPF移至更高的升空高度并以较低的CO_2稀释吹出。尽管有不同的配置,但在部分预混以及空气和燃料流的稀释程度方面,同流和逆流火焰的熄灭特性具有显着相似性。消灭逆流火焰和同流火焰所需的临界燃料流CO_2摩尔分数随φ的增加(即,部分预混水平的降低)而增加。相反,临界空气流CO_2摩尔分数随φ的增加而降低。结果还表明交叉值φ≈2.0,对应于f_s = 0.5的化学计量混合分数,因此f_s <0.5的火焰(包括NPF)更难以用燃料流稀释来熄灭,因为氧气是缺乏的-活性剂,而f_s> 0.5的火焰更难通过气流稀释而熄灭,因为燃料是这些火焰的不足反应物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号