首页> 外文期刊>Color Research and Application >Comparison of Different Monoptic and Dichoptic Color-Matching Functions
【24h】

Comparison of Different Monoptic and Dichoptic Color-Matching Functions

机译:不同一元和二元色彩匹配功能的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The objective of this article is to analyze different color matching functions (CMFs) obtained with three (650,530,and 460 nm) and four primary colors (650,565,513,and 460 nm),using both monoptic and dichoptic central vision.This strategy helps to clarify (i) lack of additivity of brilliance;(ii) shift in maximum sensitivity peaks of CMFs when experimental conditions change;(iii) variations in luminance for the same reason;(iv) strong metamerism of the mixtures;and (v) differences of chromatic opponence between monoptic and dichoptic vision.The results obtained reflect two important facts:marked stability of the visual system,which allows the experimental conditions analyzed to be solved with an equal degree of success,and plasticity based especially on the balance of retinal illumination,which was maintained at an average of 40 trolands.The results obtained bring to mind an assertion made by MacAdam to the effect that the law of additivity when applied to luminance is not applied to measurements of brightness.Perceptively,brightness is not additive,and so CMFs should not be considered as significant functions in computing tristimulus values R,G,and B.
机译:本文的目的是使用单色和二分中心视觉来分析由三种(650,530和460 nm)和四种原色(650,565,513和460 nm)获得的不同颜色匹配函数(CMF)。该策略有助于阐明(i)缺乏光辉的可加性;(ii)实验条件改变时CMF的最大灵敏度峰移动;(iii)出于相同原因的亮度变化;(iv)混合物强烈的同色异谱;以及(v)不同单视场和二视场视觉之间存在色差。所得结果反映了两个重要事实:视觉系统的显着稳定性,可以使分析的实验条件获得同等的成功度;以及可塑性,特别是基于视网膜照明的平衡,它平均维持在40 troland。获得的结果让我想起了MacAdam的断言,即适用于亮度的加性定律不适用于m在感知上,亮度不是累加的,因此在计算三刺激值R,G和B时,不应将CMF视为重要函数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号