首页> 外文期刊>Cold War History >Under the national paradigm: Cold War studies and Cold War politics in post-Cold War Norden
【24h】

Under the national paradigm: Cold War studies and Cold War politics in post-Cold War Norden

机译:在国家范式下:冷战后诺登的冷战研究和冷战政治

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

On a comparative basis this article explores the profile of Cold War University teaching and Cold War research as carried out in the Post-Cold War period in the Nordic countries. A number of overall conclusions are drawn from this exploration. Firstly concerning teaching, that Cold War courses are mainly taught within the setting of History, and that the political aspects of the Cold War conflict are mostly in focus in Denmark, Finland, Iceland and Norway whereas a culture and society approach dominates in Sweden. Secondly concerning research, the article argues that Cold War research during the last 10-15 years has taken a tremendous leap forward, often through government-sponsored research programmes or appointed commissions. All the same, the author is critical of the strict national approach of most research and the complete lack of comparative Nordic studies, but also of the limited attempts to insert Nordic research findings into the international Cold War debate. However, and thirdly, the article is also analyzing and discussing the role of the Cold War in post-1989 politics and debates. It is demonstrated that Cold War issues have continued to play a prominent role in the Post-Cold War period albeit with a varying degree of intensity within the individual Nordic countries with Norway seeing least controversy and Denmark at the other end having experienced a very radical and intense political debate on issues like alliance (dis)loyalty, fellow travelling and police surveillance and control. The article concludes that level of intensity of these debates is mainly defined by the degree to which such Cold War issues are and can be inserted into national controversies of contemporary politics.
机译:在比较的基础上,本文探讨了冷战后时期在北欧国家进行的冷战大学教学和冷战研究的概况。这项探索得出了许多总体结论。首先,关于教学,冷战课程主要在历史背景下进行,而冷战冲突的政治方面则主要集中在丹麦,芬兰,冰岛和挪威,而文化和社会方法则在瑞典占主导地位。其次,关于研究,文章认为,过去10到15年间,冷战研究取得了巨大的飞跃,通常是通过政府资助的研究计划或指定的委员会进行的。尽管如此,作者批评大多数研究都采用严格的国家方法,而完全缺乏比较北欧研究,但也批评了将北欧研究结果纳入国际冷战辩论的有限尝试。但是,第三,本文还分析和讨论了冷战在1989年后政治和辩论中的作用。事实证明,尽管在各个北欧国家中,冷战问题在后冷战时期继续扮演着重要角色,但挪威的争议最小,而挪威的另一端则经历了非常激进和激烈的辩论。关于联盟(不忠实)忠诚度,同伴旅行和警察监视与控制等问题的激烈政治辩论。文章得出的结论是,这些辩论的激烈程度主要取决于这种冷战问题在何种程度上可以被纳入当代政治的全国性争议中。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Cold War History》 |2008年第2期|189-211|共23页
  • 作者

    Thorsten B. Olesen;

  • 作者单位

    University of Aarhus, Denmark,;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:15:48

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号