首页> 外文期刊>Cognitive science >Is Language Required to Represent Others’ Mental States? Evidence From Beliefs and Other Representations
【24h】

Is Language Required to Represent Others’ Mental States? Evidence From Beliefs and Other Representations

机译:需要使用语言来代表他人的心理状态吗?来自信仰和其他陈述的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

An important part of our Theory of Mind-the ability to reason about other people's unobservable mental states-is the ability to attribute false beliefs to others. We investigated whether processing these false beliefs, as well as similar but nonmental representations, is reliant on language. Participants watched videos in which a protagonist hides a gift and either takes a photo of it or writes a text about its location before a second person inadvertently moves the present to a different location, thereby rendering the belief and either the photo or text false. At the same time, participants performed either a concurrent verbal interference task (rehearsing strings of digits) or a visual interference task (remembering a visual pattern). Results showed that performance on false belief trials did not decline under verbal interference relative to visual interference. We interpret these findings as further support for the view that language does not form an essential part of the process of reasoning online ("in the moment") about false beliefs.
机译:我们的心理理论的重要组成部分-能够推理他人无法观察到的心理状态的能力-能够将错误的信念归因于他人。我们调查了处理这些错误信念以及类似但非心理的表示是否依赖于语言。参与者观看了视频,其中主角隐藏了礼物并拍照,或者在第二人无意间将礼物移至其他位置之前写了关于礼物位置的文字,从而使信念和照片或文字成为假。同时,参与者执行了同时进行的语言干扰任务(排练数字字符串)或视觉干扰任务(记住了视觉模式)。结果表明,相对于视觉干扰,在口头干扰下,错误信念试验的表现并未下降。我们将这些发现解释为对以下观点的进一步支持:语言不是在线(“当前”)推理错误信念的过程中不可或缺的部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号