首页> 外文期刊>Cognitive Neuropsychiatry >Implicit attributional style revisited: Evidence for a state-specific “self-decreasing” implicit attributional style in patients with persecutory delusions
【24h】

Implicit attributional style revisited: Evidence for a state-specific “self-decreasing” implicit attributional style in patients with persecutory delusions

机译:内隐归因风格的再研究:迫害性妄想患者针对特定状态的“自我降低”内隐归因风格的证据

获取原文
       

摘要

Introduction. Although evidence suggests a discrepancy between the implicit and explicit attributional style (AS) in persons with persecutory delusions, this line of research has also produced conflicting findings. Thus, the aim of this study was to explain inconsistent results in implicit AS by introducing a modified assessment of implicit AS, which offered three attributional loci (internal, personal, and situational) instead of two (internal and external) as in previous studies and by investigating the associations between implicit AS, implicit self-esteem, explicit AS, and explicit self-esteem. Methods. Patients with acute persecutory delusions, patients with remitted persecutory delusions, and nonclinical controls were assessed in their implicit and explicit AS and implicit and explicit self-esteem. Results. Deluded patients presented an implicit “self-decreasing” AS compared to remitted patients and controls: They attributed negative events more towards themselves and positive events more towards situational factors, whereas their explicit self-serving AS was comparable to controls. Patients' implicit self-decreasing AS was associated with low implicit self-esteem. In addition, compared to remitted patients and controls, deluded patients presented low explicit and normal implicit self-esteem. Conclusions. The results shed light on the inconsistent findings in previous studies and indicate that persecutory delusions might be fed by implicit self-decreasing AS and an unstable self-esteem.View full textDownload full textKeywordsAttributional style, Persecutory delusions, Implicit, Schizophrenia, Self-esteem, Self-serving biasRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13546801003640419
机译:介绍。尽管有证据表明,在遭受迫害妄想的人中,内隐和外显的归因方式(AS)之间存在差异,但这一研究领域也产生了矛盾的发现。因此,本研究的目的是通过引入隐式AS的改良评估方法来解释隐式AS中不一致的结果,该评估提供了三个归因基因座(内部,个人和情境),而不是以前的研究中的两个归因基因座(内部和外部)。通过调查隐式AS,隐式自尊,显式AS和显式自尊之间的关联。方法。评估具有急性迫害性妄想症,缓解性迫害性妄想症和非临床对照的患者的隐性和显性AS以及隐性和显性自尊。结果。与退回的患者和对照组相比,受迷惑的患者表现出一种隐式的“自我降低” AS:他们将消极事件更多地归因于自己,将积极事件更多地归因于情境因素,而其显式的自我服务型AS与对照组具有可比性。患者的内隐自我降低AS与低内隐自尊相关。此外,与缓解的患者和对照组相比,受迷惑的患者表现出较低的显性和正常的内隐自尊。结论。结果揭示了先前研究中不一致的发现,并表明迫害妄想可能是由内隐的自我减少AS和不稳定的自尊所引起的。查看全文下载全文关键词归因风格,迫害妄想,内隐,精神分裂症,自尊,自我服务偏见相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b” };添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13546801003640419

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号