...
首页> 外文期刊>Cognitive linguistics >Turning back to experience in Cognitive Linguistics via phenomenology
【24h】

Turning back to experience in Cognitive Linguistics via phenomenology

机译:回到现象学的认知语言学经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Cognitive Linguistics began as an apotheosis of lived experience, but has over the years diversified into many different stands, interpreting the notion of "experience" and along with it the notion of "cognition" in conflicting ways: individual or social, prelinguistic or linguistic, unconscious or conscious? These issues are not only philosophical as they hold crucial implications for methodology. Here, I propose that most of them can be resolved with the help of phenomenology, "the study of human experience and of the ways things present themselves to us in and through such experience" (Sokolowski 2000. Introduction to phenomenology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2). Cogent syntheses are proposed to the individual/social and prelinguistic/linguistic debates, showing that scholars like Langacker, Talmy and Itkonen have focused on complementary aspects of implicitly phenomenological investigations. Third-person, "objective" methods are necessary for extending the scope of such investigations, but epistemologically secondary. Thus, the focus of Cognitive Linguistics can be brought back to experience, albeit in a more mature manner than 30 years ago.
机译:认知语言学最初是一种生活经验的神化,但多年来已多元化发展为多种立场,以一种相互矛盾的方式解释“体验”概念以及“认知”概念:个人或社会,前语言或语言,无意识还是有意识?这些问题不仅是哲学问题,因为它们对方法学具有至关重要的意义。在这里,我建议可以通过现象学解决“其中的大多数问题”,即“对人类经验以及事物在这种经验中以及通过这种经验呈现给我们的研究”(Sokolowski2000。现象学导论。纽约:剑桥)大学出版社,2)。针对个人/社会和语言前/语言论的辩论提出了有说服力的综合,表明像Langacker,Talmy和Itkonen这样的学者关注的是隐含现象学研究的互补方面。第三人称“客观”方法对于扩大此类研究的范围是必要的,但在认识论上是次要的。因此,尽管以比30年前更成熟的方式,认知语言学的焦点可以重新带回经验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号