...
首页> 外文期刊>Climatic Change >GCM-based regional temperature and precipitation change estimates for Europe under four SRES scenarios applying a super-ensemble pattern-scaling method
【24h】

GCM-based regional temperature and precipitation change estimates for Europe under four SRES scenarios applying a super-ensemble pattern-scaling method

机译:应用超集成模式缩放方法在四种SRES情景下基于GCM的欧洲区域温度和降水变化估算

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Seasonal GCM-based temperature and precipitation projections for the end of the 21st century are presented for five European regions; projections are compared with corresponding estimates given by the PRUDENCE RCMs. For most of the six global GCMs studied, only responses to the SRES A2 and B2 forcing scenarios are available. To formulate projections for the A1FI and B1 forcing scenarios, a super-ensemble pattern-scaling technique has been developed. This method uses linear regression to represent the relationship between the local GCM-simulated response and the global mean temperature change simulated by a simple climate model. The method has several advantages: e.g., the noise caused by internal variability is reduced, and the information provided by GCM runs performed with various forcing scenarios is utilized effectively. The super-ensemble method proved especially useful when only one A2 and one B2 simulation is available for an individual GCM. Next, 95% probability intervals were constructed for regional temperature and precipitation change, separately for the four forcing scenarios, by fitting a normal distribution to the set of projections calculated by the GCMs. For the high-end of the A1FI uncertainty interval, temperature increases close to 10°C could be expected in the southern European summer and northern European winter. Conversely, the low-end warming estimates for the B1 scenario are ~ 1°C. The uncertainty intervals of precipitation change are quite broad, but the mean estimate is one of a marked increase in the north in winter and a drastic reduction in the south in summer. In the RCM simulations driven by a single global model, the spread of the temperature and precipitation projections tends to be smaller than that in the GCM simulations, but it is possible to reduce this disparity by employing several driving models for all RCMs. In the present suite of simulations, the difference between the mean GCM and RCM projections is fairly small, regardless of the number or driving models applied.
机译:介绍了五个欧洲地区对21世纪末基于GCM的季节性温度和降水预测。将预测与PRUDENCE RCM给出的相应估计进行比较。对于所研究的六个全球GCM中的大多数,仅提供对SRES A2和B2强迫情景的响应。为了制定A1FI和B1强迫情景的预测,已经开发了一种超集成的模式缩放技术。该方法使用线性回归来表示由简单气候模型模拟的本地GCM模拟响应与全球平均温度变化之间的关系。该方法具有几个优点:例如,减少了由内部可变性引起的噪声,并且有效利用了在各种强迫情况下执行的GCM运行提供的信息。当单个GCM仅提供一个A2和一个B2仿真时,超级合奏方法特别有用。接下来,通过将正态分布拟合到由GCM计算的一组预测中,分别为四种强迫情景构建了95%的概率区间,用于区域温度和降水变化。对于A1FI不确定性区间的高端,在南欧夏季和北欧冬季,温度可能会升高接近10°C。相反,B1情景的低端变暖估计约为1°C。降水变化的不确定性区间很宽,但平均估计值是冬季北方显着增加和夏季南方显着减少之一。在由单个全局模型驱动的RCM仿真中,温度和降水量预测的散布趋向于比GCM仿真中的散布小,但可以通过对所有RCM采用几种驱动模型来减小这种差异。在当前的仿真套件中,无论所应用的数量或驾驶模型如何,平均GCM和RCM投影之间的差异都非常小。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Climatic Change 》 |2007年第s1期| 193-208| 共16页
  • 作者单位

    Finnish Meteorological Institute P.O. Box 503 00101 Helsinki Finland;

    Finnish Meteorological Institute P.O. Box 503 00101 Helsinki Finland;

    Finnish Meteorological Institute P.O. Box 503 00101 Helsinki Finland;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号