...
首页> 外文期刊>Climate Policy >The Regensburg Model: reference values for the (I)NDCs based on converging per capita emissions
【24h】

The Regensburg Model: reference values for the (I)NDCs based on converging per capita emissions

机译:雷根斯堡模型:(I)NDC的参考值基于人均排放总量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A core question still remains after the Paris Agreement: who receives how much of the remaining CO2 budget (resource/burden/effort sharing), so that the increase in the global average temperature is kept to well below 2 degrees C above pre-industrial levels? If converging per capita emissions serve as a possible answer to this question, the discussion focuses primarily on the approach Contraction and Convergence' (C&C). The Regensburg Model now offers a further option for the mathematical implementation of converging per capita emissions. The authors identify features common to C&C and differences from C&C. They show that, of the convergence models they examined, the Regensburg Model is the most favourable option for industrialized countries.Policy relevanceIn politics, the concept of converging per capita emissions is often accepted at the abstract level. Civil society in particular can then take politicians at their word wherever they take values calculated using the Regensburg Model as points of reference; then prosperous developed countries in particular whose nationally determined contributions do not come up even to these reference values will find it difficult to justify their contributions.
机译:《巴黎协定》之后,仍然存在一个核心问题:谁收到了多少剩余的二氧化碳预算(资源/负担/工作量共享),以便全球平均温度的上升幅度保持在比工业化前水平低2摄氏度以下?如果收敛的人均排放量可能是该问题的答案,则讨论主要集中在“收缩与收敛”(C&C)方法上。雷根斯堡模型现在为人均排放总量的数学实现提供了进一步的选择。作者确定了C&C的共同特征以及与C&C的区别。他们表明,在他们研究的趋同模型中,雷根斯堡模型是工业化国家最有利的选择。政策的相关性在政治上,人均排放趋同的概念通​​常在抽象层面被接受。公民社会尤其可以在任何地方接受以雷根斯堡模型计算的价值为参照的政客。那么,特别是那些国家自主贡献甚至达不到这些参考值的繁荣发达国家,将很难证明其贡献是合理的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号