...
【24h】

UPDATE

机译:更新

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The Expert Panel on Air Quality Standards (EPAQS) recent report, published in June, addresses what is the appropriate measurement on which to base a standard for ambient airborne particles. The standard, recommended by the Panel in 1995, is based on measurement of PM_(10). In their new report, the Panel conclude that this metric has stood the test of time and has allowed the demonstration of robust relationships between changes in concentrations of PM_(10) and health effects. They go on to recommend that in the absence of evidence that any alternative metric shows a closer and more reliable association with health outcomes, there is no pressing need to substitute one.
机译:空气质量标准专家组(EPAQS)于6月发布的最新报告探讨了环境空气中悬浮颗粒物标准的适当测量方法。专家小组在1995年建议的标准是基于对PM_(10)的测量。专家小组在其新报告中得出结论,该指标经受了时间的考验,并证明了PM_(10)浓度变化与健康影响之间的牢固关系。他们继续建议,在没有证据表明任何其他指标显示与健康结局更紧密,更可靠的关联的情况下,迫切需要替代一项指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号