首页> 外文期刊>City >‘Journeys of the I and we’: Theorizing the ethnographic encounter over time
【24h】

‘Journeys of the I and we’: Theorizing the ethnographic encounter over time

机译:“我与我们的旅程”:将人种学理论随着时间的推移理论化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

For ethnographers repeatedly engaged with the same community on the ‘margins’, questions of access, positionality and representation become compounded by temporal dynamism. Participant and researcher subjectivities change over time, thus destabilizing identities and calling into question where and how to frame conversations. I reflect on bridging the gap between theoretical perspectives on the ‘margins’ and how inhabitants of a Delhi resettlement colony variously describe notions of liminality—from the metaphoric, to the geographic and to the social—over a prolonged ethnographic encounter. By bringing the temporal ‘journey’ of the researcher and interlocutor to the fore, I seek to open up a conversation on situated knowledges. More specifically, I ask how (and if) urban ethnographers can adequately capture shifting aspirations and feelings of in-betweenness, while grappling with one’s own responsibility to politically engaged research. Finally, I discuss the political relevance of evolving attitudes towards life on the margins, with implications for knowledge production and representation.
机译:对于在“边缘”上反复与同一个社区接触的人种学家来说,访问性,位置性和表示性问题由于时间动力而变得更加复杂。参与者和研究人员的主观性随时间而变化,从而破坏了身份的稳定性,并引发了质疑在何处以及如何进行对话的问题。我在反思如何弥合“边际”的理论观点与德里移民殖民地居民如何通过长期的人种学接触,从隐喻性到地理和社会性来形容关于合法性的概念之间的差距。通过突出研究人员和对话者的时间“旅程”,我寻求就环境知识展开对话。更具体地说,我问城市人种志学家如何(以及是否)能充分把握转变中的愿望和中间人的感觉,同时又要承担自己对从事政治研究的责任。最后,我讨论了边际生活态度的演变在政治上的相关性,对知识生产和代表性具有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号