...
首页> 外文期刊>Cities >Privatizing public housing redevelopment: Grassroots resistance, co-operation and devastation in three Dublin neighbourhoods
【24h】

Privatizing public housing redevelopment: Grassroots resistance, co-operation and devastation in three Dublin neighbourhoods

机译:将公共房屋重建私有化:都柏林三个街区的基层抵抗,合作与破坏

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This article examines variations in residents' responses to proposals to redevelop three public housing neighbourhoods in Dublin using Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) and the outcomes their resistance achieved. It investigates the important role that structures of participation and representation and local social cohesion play in developing effective resident resistance to displacement and gentrification through regeneration. In two of these neighbourhoods community representative structures were strong and although one community cooperated with the PPP plans and the other opposed them, both were broadly successful in achieving their campaign objectives. Community structures in the third neighbourhood were weak however and the imposition of PPP redevelopment devastated this community which is now almost entirely vacant. This article provides some important insights for the literature on grassroots resistance to urban redevelopment, welfare state restructuring and public housing redevelopment. It reveals that, despite their lack of power, residents' resistance can significantly influence public housing redevelopment strategies particularly where community representative structures are strong. However for vulnerable communities, where representative structures are weak, the over emphasis on poverty de-concentration and refurbishing the built environment in public housing redevelopment policy can have devastating consequences. Thus, it concludes that the rationale for grass roots resistance to redevelopment is centred upon a strong place attachment, but also opposition to the privatization of public housing and the desire for poverty to be addressed in an holistic manner. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本文探讨了居民对使用公私伙伴关系(PPP)重建都柏林三个公共住房街区的提议的反应的差异,以及他们的抵制取得的结果。它调查了参与和代表结构以及当地社会凝聚力在发展居民对通过再生产生的流离失所和中产阶级化的有效抵抗中所起的重要作用。在这两个社区中,社区代表结构很强大,尽管一个社区与PPP计划进行了合作,另一个社区反对了PPP计划,但两个社区在实现其竞选目标方面均取得了广泛的成功。但是,第三街区的社区结构薄弱,实行PPP重建计划摧毁了这个几乎完全空置的社区。本文为基层抵抗城市重建,福利国家重组和公共住房重建的文献提供了重要的见解。它表明,尽管居民缺乏权力,但他们的抵制仍然会极大地影响公共住房的再开发策略,特别是在社区代表结构强大的地方。但是,对于代表机构薄弱的脆弱社区而言,在公共住房重建政策中过分强调贫困人口的集中化和整修建筑环境可能会造成毁灭性后果。因此,得出的结论是,基层抵制重建的理论基础是牢固的场所依恋,但也反对公共住房的私有化和以整体方式解决贫困的愿望。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号