...
首页> 外文期刊>Cities >How do we understand smart cities? An evolutionary perspective
【24h】

How do we understand smart cities? An evolutionary perspective

机译:我们如何理解智慧城市?进化的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Smart city approaches in city planning have gained significant momentum in the recent past. While proponents argue that smart cities will bring positive social change by the adoption of ICTs, enriched governance and human capital among the citizenry, opponents point out about the negative effects and gaps exist in their planning and execution. Despite efforts to promote its practice, there has been wide criticism about the concept and the way it has been adopted and implemented. The roles of various players, especially the central role of the private sector, is often challenged in the academic literature. A variety of expectations from various stakeholders make the potential implementation strategies even more complex. The current paper reviews the research in the field to date to find that there are conflicting views in smart city planning, which limit our knowledge about the 'real' smart city and its implications for building creative and inclusive urban space. Such uncertainty at the conceptual level, and the heightened importance given by policy makers and markets to its adoption, highlights the need for proper scrutiny. The paper clusters the various views pertaining to the building of smart cities and, thereby, proposes a 3RC framework, consisting of Restrictive, Reflective, Rationalistic and Critical schools, which critically analyses various stages in the development of the field. The overall aim of the paper is to understand how smart cities differ in their meanings, intentions and 'offerings'.
机译:最近,城市规划中的智慧城市方法获得了巨大发展。支持者们认为,智慧城市将通过采用信息通信技术,给居民带来丰富的治理和人力资本来带来积极的社会变革,但反对者指出其负面影响和规划和执行方面存在差距。尽管为促进其实践付出了许多努力,但对该概念及其采用和实施的方式仍存在广泛的批评。在学术文献中经常挑战各种参与者的角色,尤其是私营部门的核心角色。各个利益相关者的各种期望使潜在的实施策略变得更加复杂。本篇论文回顾了迄今为止在该领域的研究,发现在智慧城市规划中存在相互矛盾的观点,这限制了我们对“真正的”智慧城市及其对建设创造性和包容性城市空间的意义的认识。从概念上讲,这种不确定性以及决策者和市场对其采用的重视程度越来越高,这凸显了进行适当审查的必要性。本文集中了与智慧城市建设有关的各种观点,从而提出了一个3RC框架,该框架由限制性,反思性,理性主义和批判性学校组成,该框架批判性地分析了该领域发展的各个阶段。本文的总体目标是了解智慧城市在意义,意图和“优惠”方面的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号