首页> 外文期刊>Cities >Governing the gaps in water governance and land-use planning in a megacity: The example of hydrological risk in Mexico City
【24h】

Governing the gaps in water governance and land-use planning in a megacity: The example of hydrological risk in Mexico City

机译:治理大城市中水治理和土地利用规划中的差距:墨西哥城的水文风险示例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Megacities are socio-ecological systems (SES) that encompass complex interactions between residents, institutions, and natural resource management. These interactions are exacerbated by climate change as resources such as water become scarce or hazardous through drought and flooding. In order to develop pathways for improved sustainability, the disparate factors that create vulnerable conditions and outcomes must be visible to decision makers. Nevertheless, for such decision-makers to manage vulnerability effectively, they need to define the salient boundaries of the urban SES, and the relevant biophysical, technological, and socio-institutional attributes that play critical roles in vulnerability dynamics. Here we explore the problem of hydrological risk in Mexico City, where vulnerabilities to flooding and water scarcity are interconnected temporally and spatially, yet the formal and informal institutions and actors involved in the production and management of vulnerability are divided into two discrete problem domains: land-use planning and water resource management. We analyze interviews with city officials working in both domains to understand their different perspectives on the dynamics of socio-hydrological risk, including flooding and water scarcity. We find governance gaps within land-use planning and water management that lead to hydro-social risk, stemming from a failure to address informal institutions that exacerbate vulnerability to flooding and water scarcity. Mandates in both sectors are overlapping and confusing, while socio-hydrological risk is externalized to the informal domain, making it ungoverned. Integrated water management approaches that recognize and incorporate informality are needed to reduce vulnerability to water scarcity and flooding.
机译:特大城市是社会生态系统(SES),包含居民,机构和自然资源管理之间的复杂相互作用。气候变化加剧了这些相互作用,因为诸如水的资源由于干旱和洪水而变得稀缺或危险。为了开发改善可持续性的途径,造成脆弱条件和结果的不同因素必须对决策者可见。但是,为了使此类决策者有效地管理脆弱性,他们需要定义城市SES的显着边界以及在脆弱性动态中发挥关键作用的相关生物物理,技术和社会制度属性。在这里,我们探讨了墨西哥城的水文风险问题,那里的洪水泛滥和水资源短缺的脆弱性在时间和空间上相互关联,而参与脆弱性生产和管理的正式和非正式机构和参与者则分为两个独立的问题领域:土地使用规划和水资源管理。我们分析了在这两个领域工作的城市官员的访谈,以了解他们对社会水文风险(包括洪水和水资源短缺)动态的不同看法。我们发现,土地使用规划和水资源管理中的治理差距导致了水社会风险,其原因是未能解决非正式机构,加剧了洪水和水资源短缺的脆弱性。这两个部门的任务是重叠和混乱的,而社会水文风险则被外部化到非正规领域,从而使其不受控制。需要采取综合性的水管理方法来认识并纳入非正式性,以减少对水资源短缺和洪水的脆弱性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号