首页> 外文期刊>China & World Economy >Monetary Policies versus Regulatory Policies: Management of Peer to Peer Market Interest Rates
【24h】

Monetary Policies versus Regulatory Policies: Management of Peer to Peer Market Interest Rates

机译:货币政策与监管政策:点对点市场利率管理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper studies how monetary and regulatory policies manage peer to peer (P2P) interest rates. Based on selected representative monetary and regulatory policies, this paper finds that easy monetary policies reduce the demand for online loans, thus reducing the market's interest rates. Monetary policies may increase the supply of online loans through rational expectation channels or reduce the demand for online loans through bank risk-taking channels. Normative market-based regulatory policy enables the P2P market to return to rationality, eliminates high-risk investors and borrowers, and subsequently reduces market interest rates. Risk disposal-based regulatory policy reduces market supply to some extent, resulting in a small increase in interest rates. Both easy monetary policies and regulatory policies have a great impact on the normal platforms. The interest rate of high-risk platforms is less affected by the relevant policies, which is evidence that such platforms do not behave in accordance with the financial rules in general. Monetary policies mainly affect platforms with interest rates in a relatively normal range, while regulatory policies mainly focus on platforms with abnormal interest rates.
机译:本文研究了货币和监管政策如何管理点对点(P2P)利率。基于选定的代表性货币和监管政策,本文发现宽松的货币政策会减少对在线贷款的需求,从而降低市场利率。货币政策可能会通过理性预期渠道增加在线贷款的供应,或者通过银行冒险渠道减少对在线贷款的需求。基于规范的基于市场的监管政策可使P2P市场恢复理性,消除高风险的投资者和借款人,从而降低市场利率。基于风险处置的监管政策在某种程度上减少了市场供应,导致利率小幅上涨。宽松的货币政策和监管政策都对正常平台产生很大影响。高风险平台的利率受相关政策的影响较小,这表明此类平台的行为通常不符合财务规则。货币政策主要影响利率在相对正常范围内的平台,而监管政策主要关注利率异常的平台。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号