首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Preventing Chronic Disease >Peer Reviewed: Public Policy Versus Individual Rights and Responsibility: An Economist’s Perspective
【2h】

Peer Reviewed: Public Policy Versus Individual Rights and Responsibility: An Economist’s Perspective

机译:同行评审:公共政策与个人权利与责任:经济学家的观点

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Interventions to reduce childhood obesity entail ethical considerations. Although a rationale exists for government to intervene in a way that limits individual rights while protecting the public's health, a clear economic rationale also exists. The markets for goods and services that contribute to obesity are characterized by multiple failures that create an economic rationale for government to intervene (eg, consumers' lack of accurate information regarding obesogenic foods and beverages). If effective public policies for reducing obesity and its consequences are to be developed and implemented, individual rights and government interests must be balanced.
机译:减少儿童肥胖的干预措施需要道德上的考虑。尽管存在政府以限制个人权利同时保护公众健康的方式进行干预的理由,但也存在明确的经济理由。导致肥胖的商品和服务市场的特征是多重失误,造成政府干预的经济原理(例如,消费者缺乏有关致肥胖症食品和饮料的准确信息)。如果要制定和执行有效的减少肥胖症及其后果的公共政策,则必须权衡个人权利和政府利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号