首页> 外文期刊>Child Care in Practice >Are We Listening to Children? An Examination of the Child's Voice in Social Work Reports to the Court following Parental Separation Disputes
【24h】

Are We Listening to Children? An Examination of the Child's Voice in Social Work Reports to the Court following Parental Separation Disputes

机译:我们在听孩子吗?在父母分居纠纷发生后向法院提交的社会工作报告中对孩子的声音进行检查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper examines the findings from a recent study investigating how children's interests and their rights are safeguarded through the representation of social workers in reports prepared for Court following parental separation disputes. A small-scale research study describes the views of family and childcare social workers on how children's wishes and feelings are reflected in Court-directed assessments in a large Health and Social Services Trust in Northern Ireland. The research employs a multi-data collection methodology involving the use of a focus group, postal questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. The data were thematically analysed in relation to representing the voice of the child, and examined both the social work task and the role of training as a form of support for social workers in this demanding area of work. The findings demonstrate that social workers do seek and represent the views of the child within Article 4 reports, but identify factors that impinge on the accuracy of representing children's views and promoting their rights. These factors relate to Trust and Court priorities, lack of therapeutic intervention for children, variation in social work practice, lack of training for social work staff in this area and, consequently, the need to increase confidence and support for social work staff undertaking this work. As a result of these findings, suggestions are proposed for informing practice and improving service delivery in this key area of family and childcare social work practice.
机译:本文考察了最近一项研究的发现,该研究调查在父母分居纠纷发生后为法院准备的报告中如何通过社会工作者的代表来维护儿童的利益及其权利。一项小型研究报告描述了家庭和育儿社会工作者对北爱尔兰一家大型卫生与社会服务信托基金在法院指导的评估中如何反映儿童的愿望和感受的看法。该研究采用了多种数据收集方法,其中包括使用焦点小组,邮政调查表和半结构化访谈。对数据进行了专题分析,以表示孩子的声音,并检查了社会工作任务和培训在这一要求严格的工作领域为社会工作者提供支持的形式的作用。调查结果表明,社会工作者确实在第4条报告中寻求并代表了儿童的观点,但是发现了影响代表儿童观点和增进其权利的准确性的因素。这些因素涉及信托和法院的优先事项,对儿童的治疗干预不足,社会工作实践的差异,在这一领域对社会工作人员的培训不足以及因此需要增强对从事这项工作的社会工作人员的信心和支持。这些发现的结果是,提出了一些建议,以指导家庭和育儿社会工作实践这一关键领域的实践并改善服务质量。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号