首页> 外文期刊>Chest >Determination of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference Scores for the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised Respiratory Symptom Scale in Two Populations of Patients With Cystic Fibrosis and Chronic
【24h】

Determination of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference Scores for the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised Respiratory Symptom Scale in Two Populations of Patients With Cystic Fibrosis and Chronic

机译:确定两个囊性纤维化和慢性病患者的囊性纤维化问卷调查表修订的呼吸系统症状量表的最小临床重要差异评分

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) is a validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) containing both generic scales and scales specific to cystic fibrosis (CF). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) score for a PRO corresponds to the smallest clinically relevant change a patient can detect. MCID scores for the CFQ-R respiratory symptom (CFQ-R-Respiratory) scale were determined using data from two 28 day, open-label, tobramycin inhalation solution (TIS) studies in patients with CF and chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa airway infection. At study enrollment, patients in the study 1-exacerbation had symptoms indicative of pulmonary exacerbation (n = 84; < 14 years of age, 31 patients; ≥ 14 years of age, 53 patients); patients in study 2-stable had stable respiratory symptoms (n = 140; < 14 years of age, 14 patients; ≥ 14 years, 126 patients). nnMethods: The anchor-based method utilized a global rating-of-change questionnaire (GRCQ) that assessed patients' perceptions of change in their respiratory symptoms after TIS treatment. The mean change from baseline CFQ-R-Respiratory scores were mapped onto the GRCQ to estimate the MCID. The two distribution-based methods were as follows: (1) 0.5 SD of mean change in CFQ-R-Respiratory scores (baseline to end of TIS treatment); and (2) 1 SEM for baseline CFQ-R-Respiratory scores. Triangulation of these three estimates defined the MCIDs. nnResults: MCID scores were larger for patients in study 1-exacerbation (8.5 points) than for those in study 2-stable (4.0 points), likely reflecting differences in patient disease status (exacerbation/stable) between these studies. nnConclusions: Patient benefit from new and current CF therapies can be evaluated using changes in CFQ-R-Respiratory scores. Using the MCID provides a systematic way to interpret these changes, and facilitates the identification of CF treatments that improve both symptoms and physiologic variables, potentially leading to better treatment adherence and clinical outcomes. nnTrial registration (study 1-exacerbation): Australian-New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Identifier: ACTRN 12605000602628 nnTrial registration (study 2-stable): ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00104520 nnThere is growing recognition that patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as health-related quality of life (HRQOL), are important indicators of patient benefit in clinical trials.1–3 This is particularly true for patients with chronic illnesses such as cystic fibrosis (CF), for whom disease management is both challenging and lifelong. nnPROs assess clinical benefit from the patient's perspective and must meet basic psychometric criteria, such as reliability and validity. It is also important to establish their responsiveness, or ability to detect clinical change, and to determine how to interpret the magnitude of change observed.4 The minimal clinically important difference (MCID [also abbreviated as MID in other publications]) score corresponds to the smallest clinically relevant change a patient can detect.5,6 Methods to establish MCID scores fall into the following two broad categories: anchor-based and distribution-based. Anchor-based methods rely on a series of ratings made by patients; these ratings quantify the extent of change perceived during or after a clinical intervention. This value is then mapped onto the change reported for the PRO. Essentially, anchor-based methods calibrate how much change on the PRO is perceived by patients as minimal, moderate, or large. In contrast, distribution-based methods rely on statistical tests; 0.5 SD of the change in HRQOL scores and 1 SEM are two of the statistical tests used to estimate MCIDs.7,8nnThe Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) is a validated HRQOL measure for CF that meets US Food and Drug Administration psychometric requirements for PROs.9–12 It contains both generic and CF-specific scales and has demonstrated responsiveness in previous clinical studies.13,14 For patients with CF who have moderate-to-severe lung disease and persistent Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) airway infection, long-term use of tobramycin inhalation solution (TIS) is the currently recognized standard of care.15–17 We determined MCID scores for the CFQ-R respiratory symptom (CFQ-R-Respiratory) scale, applying both anchor-based and distribution-based methods, using data from two TIS clinical studies. Patients in both studies had CF and chronic PA airway infection. In the first study (study 1-exacerbation),18 patients received 28 days of therapy with open-label TIS to treat symptoms indicative of pulmonary exacerbation. In the second study (study 2-stable),19 patients with stable respiratory symptoms received 28 days of therapy with open-label TIS. The responsiveness of the CFQ-R-Respiratory scale was assessed in these patient populations by comparing changes in CFQ-R-Respiratory scores with changes in pulmonary function. This work was previously published in abstract form.20,21
机译:背景:囊性纤维化问卷调查表(CFQ-R)是经过验证的患者报告结局(PRO),既包含通用量表,也包含针对囊性纤维化(CF)的量表。 PRO的最小临床重要差异(MCID)评分对应于患者可以检测到的最小临床相关变化。 CFQ-R呼吸系统症状(CFQ-R-Respiratory)量表的MCID评分是通过对CF和慢性铜绿假单胞菌气道感染患者进行的两个为期28天的开放标签妥布霉素吸入溶液(TIS)研究得出的数据确定的。在研究入组时,研究1恶化的患者具有指示肺部恶化的症状(n = 84; <14岁,31例;≥14岁,53例);研究2稳定的患者具有稳定的呼吸道症状(n = 140; <14岁,14例;≥14岁,126例)。 nn方法:基于锚的方法利用全球变化评估表(GRCQ)评估患者对TIS治疗后呼吸道症状变化的感知。从基线CFQ-R-呼吸得分的平均变化被映射到GRCQ上以估计MCID。两种基于分布的方法如下:(1)CFQ-R-呼吸评分的平均变化的0.5 SD(基线至TIS治疗结束); (2)基线CFQ-R-呼吸得分的1 SEM。这三个估计的三角剖分定义了MCID。 nn结果:研究1恶化的患者的MCID评分(8.5分)比研究2稳定的患者的MCID评分(4.0分)要大,这可能反映了这些研究之间患者疾病状况(疾病恶化/稳定)的差异。 nn结论:可以使用CFQ-R-呼吸评分的变化来评估患者从新的和当前的CF治疗中受益。使用MCID提供了一种系统的方式来解释这些变化,并有助于确定同时改善症状和生理变量的CF治疗方法,从而有可能导致更好的治疗依从性和临床结果。 nn试验注册(研究1加重):澳大利亚-新西兰临床试验注册中心标识符:ACTRN 12605000602628 nn试验注册(研究2稳定):ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT00104520 nn人们越来越认识到患者报告的结果(PROs),例如与健康相关的生活质量(HRQOL)是临床试验中患者受益的重要指标。1–3对于患有慢性疾病如囊性纤维化(CF)的患者尤其如此,他们的疾病管理既艰巨又终生。 nnPROs从患者的角度评估临床获益,并且必须满足基本的心理计量标准,例如可靠性和有效性。建立它们的反应能力或检测临床变化的能力,并确定如何解释所观察到的变化幅度也很重要。4最小的临床重要差异(MCID [在其他出版物中也缩写为MID])评分与患者可以检测到的最小的临床相关变化。5,6建立MCID分数的方法分为以下两大类:基于锚点和基于分布。基于锚的方法依赖于患者做出的一系列评估。这些评级量化了在临床干预期间或之后感知到的变化程度。然后将此值映射到为PRO报告的更改。从本质上讲,基于锚的方法可校准PRO的变化量,使患者感觉到最小,中度或较大变化。相反,基于分布的方法依赖于统计检验。 HRQOL得分变化的0.5 SD和1 SEM是用于估计MCID的两种统计测试。7,8nn囊性纤维化问卷调查表(CFQ-R)是经过验证的CF HRQOL量度,符合美国食品药品监督管理局的心理计量标准PROs.9-12的要求它既包含通用量表,也包含CF量表,并且在先前的临床研究中已显示出反应性。13,14对于患有中至重度肺部疾病和持续性铜绿假单胞菌(PA)气道感染的CF患者,长期使用妥布霉素吸入溶液(TIS)是目前公认的护理标准。15-17我们采用基于锚和分布的方法,确定了CFQ-R呼吸系统症状(CFQ-R-Respiratory)量表的MCID评分两种TIS临床研究的数据为基础的方法。两项研究中的患者均患有CF和慢性PA气道感染。在第一项研究(研究1恶化)中,有18位患者接受了28天的开放标签TIS治疗,以治疗表明肺部恶化的症状。在第二项研究中(研究2稳定)有19名呼吸系统症状稳定的患者接受了开放标签TIS治疗28天。通过比较CFQ-R-呼吸评分与肺功能的变化,评估了这些患者人群中CFQ-R-呼吸量表的反应性。这项工作以前以抽象形式出版。20,21

著录项

  • 来源
    《Chest》 |2009年第6期|p.1610-1618|共9页
  • 作者单位

    *From University of Miami (Dr. Quittner), Coral Gables, FL, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and the University of Cincinnati (Dr. Modi), Cincinnati, OH, Royal Children's Hospital and University of Queensland (Dr. Wainwright), Brisbane, QLD, Australia, Kelly Otto Consulting (Ms. Otto), Seattle, WA, JKirihara Consulting Services (Ms. Kirihara), Seattle, WA, and Gilead Sciences Inc (Dr. Montgomery), Seattle, WA,;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号