首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Environmental Law Reports >Indexed as: Mikisew Cree First Nation v. Canada (Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development)
【24h】

Indexed as: Mikisew Cree First Nation v. Canada (Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development)

机译:索引为:Mikisew Cree第一民族诉加拿大(原住民和北部发展部部长)

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Aboriginal law-Constitutional issues - Miscellaneous-Duty to consult - In 1899 First Nation entered into treaty 8 with Crown - In 2012 federal Minister of Finance introduced omnibus bills, which received royal assent -First Nation was not consulted prior to introduction of bills - Bills introduced new and amended legislation, which made significant changes to Canada's environmental laws - First Nation claimed that Ministers had duty to consult regarding development of environmental laws as reflected in bills and they breached that duty - First Nation brought application for declaratory relief -Direction was given in specific terms - Proceedings were not precluded by s. 2(2) of Federal Courts Act - There was sufficient legal basis for court to review matter judicially, namely, whether duty to consult applied to decisions at issue, and it was not premature to consider matter - Pursuant to principles of separation of powers, court could not intervene into law-making process to impose procedural constraints on Crown Ministers acting in legislative capacity -There was no special provision in treaty 8 that characterized law-making process as Crown actions that would allow First Nation, in preference to other Canadians, to intervene in legislative process before bill that might interfere with First Nation's treaty rights - In this case intervention into law-making process would constitute undue judicial interference on Parliament's law-making function and would compromise sovereignty of Parliament - Duty to consult could not trigger judicial intervention before bill was introduced into Parliament -However, duty to consult arose in circumstances of case and was triggered upon introduction of omnibus bills - Extent of duty was for Crown to give notice to First Nation and reasonable opportunity to make submissions - It was declared that Crown had duty to consult with First Nation at time bills were introduced into Parliament - Duty comprised of giving notice to First Nation of portions of bills that might potentially have impact on their usual vocations, as defined in treaty 8, together with giving First Nation reasonable opportunity to make submissions.
机译:原住民法律-宪法问题-需咨询的杂项职责-1899年,原住民与王室签订了第8项条约-2012年,联邦财政部长推出了获得皇家同意的综合法案-引入法案之前未与原住民进行协商-法案引入了新的和经过修订的立法,对加拿大的环境法做出了重大改变-原住民声称部长有义务就法案中反映的环境法的制定进行磋商,并且违反了职责-原住民提出了要求声明性救济的申请-已下达指示用特定的术语-s不排除诉讼。 《联邦法院法》第2条第2款-法院有充分的法律依据对案件进行司法审查,即,协商义务是否适用于有争议的决定,而且考虑事项还为时过早-根据三权分立的原则,法院不能干预立法程序以对以立法身份行事的王室大臣施加程序上的限制-条约8中没有特殊条款,将立法程序定性为王室行动,该行动允许原住民优先于其他加拿大人,在可能干扰原住民条约权的法案之前介入立法程序-在这种情况下,干预立法程序将对议会的立法职能构成不当的司法干预,并且会损害议会的主权-征询职责不会触发司法在法案提交议会之前进行干预-但是,在案件和案例的情况下产生了咨询的义务在引入综合法案时被触发-职责范围是王室向原住民发出通知,并有合理的机会提出意见-宣布王位有义务在法案提交议会时与原住民协商-职责包括根据条约8的规定,将可能会影响其日常工作的部分钞票通知原住民,并给予原住民合理的提交意见的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号