...
【24h】

Dissecting 'Deception'

机译:剖析“欺骗”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

From the days of Plato and Socrates, via John Gregory and Thomas Percival in the 18th century and William Osier in the 20th, the most esteemed doctors have deceived their patients with good intentions. Today, however, the consensus on the legitimacy of deception in Western medical practice is clear: Doctors should never deceive their patients. Whether this absolute rule is morally sound or translated into clinical practice is doubtful, but I shall not, in this paper, address the ethical and empirical issues on truth telling and deception. Instead, I shall dissect the concept of deception, eval- uating various possible definitions and their limitations, and propose a new definition that embraces both acts and omissions.
机译:从柏拉图和苏格拉底时代开始,通过18世纪的John Gregory和Thomas Percival以及20世纪的William Osier,最受尊敬的医生以良好的意图欺骗了患者。但是,今天,西方医学实践中关于欺骗合法性的共识很明确:医生绝不应欺骗患者。这个绝对规则在道德上是否合理,还是转化为临床实践尚值得怀疑,但在本文中,我不会讨论关于真相讲述和欺骗的伦理和经验问题。相反,我将剖析欺骗的概念,评估各种可能的定义及其局限性,并提出一个既包含行为也包含遗漏的新定义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号