首页> 外文期刊>California management review >To Frame or Reframe: WHERE MIGHT DESIGN THINKING RESEARCH GO NEXT?
【24h】

To Frame or Reframe: WHERE MIGHT DESIGN THINKING RESEARCH GO NEXT?

机译:要构架还是重新构架:可能在哪里进行设计思考研究?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Design thinking is gaining widespread attention in the practitioner and academic literature. Successful implementation has been documented, and its value shown in empirical studies. There is little examination, however, of how design thinking practices fit with other approaches from which firms might choose to frame and solve problems such as agile, lean startup, scientific method, Six Sigma, critical thinking, and systems thinking. By digging into the basic capabilities underlying design thinking, academic researchers might better understand problem framing and solving in general and provide insight for practitioners as to where alternative approaches might be applied.
机译:设计思想在从业者和学术文献中得到了广泛的关注。成功的实施已被记录下来,其价值在实证研究中得到了证明。但是,关于设计思维实践如何与其他方法相适应的研究很少,企业可以从中选择框架来解决和解决诸如敏捷,精益创业,科学方法,六西格码,批判性思维和系统思维等问题。通过深入研究设计思维基础的基本能力,学术研究人员可能会更好地理解问题的总体框架和解决方案,并为从业人员提供有关可在何处应用替代方法的见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号