【24h】

FEEDBACK

机译:反馈

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Granted, it was a provocative way to frame the question. But we had no idea that one word would fuel so much reader reaction. Most people who responded to "Can Greed Save Africa?," our Dec. 10 Cover Story, said yes, private capital must be a big part of the global approach toward sub- Saharan Africa, the world's poorest region. But, many asked, did we have to call this investment "greed" ? Some readers did dig in along the lines we'd anticipated: arguing the case for government and nonprofit aid over private investment—or vice versa. Still others, like Global Venture, an antipoverty blog that deemed the article "insightful" overall, took issue with the notion ("tired and misguided") of trying to "save" Africa.
机译:当然,这是解决问题的一种挑衅方式。但是我们不知道一个词会引起如此多的读者反应。我们对12月10日的封面故事“贪婪能拯救非洲吗?”的大多数人说,是的,私人资本必须成为对付世界上最贫穷地区撒哈拉以南非洲的全球方法的重要组成部分。但是,许多人问,我们是否必须将这项投资称为“贪婪”?一些读者确实按照我们的预期进行了深入研究:争论政府和非营利组织对私人投资的援助情况,反之亦然。还有其他一些公司,例如Global Venture,一个反贫困博客,认为该文章总体上“缺乏见识”,对试图“拯救”非洲的观念(“疲倦和误导”)持怀疑态度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号