首页> 外文期刊>Building >GET LOST PLATO
【24h】

GET LOST PLATO

机译:失去柏拉图

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Since the introduction of the Construction Act, JCT disputes regarding loss and expense and extensions of time have, in the main, been resolved by adjudication. This is perhaps one reason for the high level of interest in the November 2007 opinion of Lord Drummond Young in the case of City Inn vs Shepherd Construction. However, what really provoked discussion was Drummond Young's apparent rejection of detailed critical path analysis in favour of a morernpractical assessment of the impact of delay events, together with an "apportionment" exercise where there was no "dominant cause" of delay. City Inn appealed against Drummond Young's decision, arguing that his approach was misconceived. The Scottish Court of Appeal issued its judgment on 22 July, and it amounts to an endorsement of Drummond Young's approach.
机译:自《建筑法》出台以来,JCT有关损失和费用以及时间延长的争议主要通过裁决解决。这可能是引起2007年11月Lord Drummond Young在City Inn vs Shepherd Construction一案中引起高度关注的原因之一。但是,真正引起讨论的是德拉蒙德·扬(Drummond Young)显然拒绝详细的关键路径分析,而倾向于对延迟事件的影响进行更实际的评估,并进行“分配”练习,而没有“延迟的主要原因”。 City Inn对德拉蒙德·杨(Drummond Young)的决定提出上诉,认为他的做法是错误的。苏格兰上诉法院于7月22日发布判决,对德拉蒙德·杨的做法表示赞同。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Building》 |2010年第31期|P.48-49|共2页
  • 作者

    Alastair Walls;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:36:04

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号