首页> 外文期刊>Building >WHO'S COUNTING?
【24h】

WHO'S COUNTING?

机译:谁在计数?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

200,000 new homes has been the magic number for annual housing delivery for successive governments -many will recall similar pledges made by then deputy prime minister John Prescott at the beginning of the millennium. Each time a government focuses on the need to increase the housing supply, the planning system bears the brunt of the changes. Such is the case with the most recent housing "crusade" promised by the government and its pledge of 200,000 starter homes. It has long been the complaint of housebuilders that the planning system is costly and riddled with delays hampering housing delivery. The coalition government introduced changes to the planning regime during the last parliament and were responsible for the introduction of the Localism Act under which local neighbourhood plans were introduced and communities encouraged to participate in local development orders and community rights to build. Most significantly of course the community infrastructure levy was introduced to deal with the age-old complaint that entering into section 106 agreements caused delay; and the National Planning Policy Framework was brought in to enable the government to affect planning policy in a much more immediate way.
机译:200,000座新房屋一直是历届政府年度住房交付的不可思议的数字-许多人会回想起千年之初时任副总理约翰·普雷斯科特(John Prescott)的类似承诺。每当政府将重点放在增加住房供应上时,规划系统就首当其冲。政府许诺的最新住房“十字军东征”就是这样,政府承诺提供200,000套新房。长期以来,房屋建筑商一直抱怨规划系统成本高昂,而且拖延繁琐,阻碍了房屋交付。联合政府在上届议会期间对规划制度进行了修改,并负责制定《地方主义法》,根据该法,引入了当地邻里计划,并鼓励社区参与地方发展命令和社区建设权。当然,最重要的是,引入了社区基础设施税,以应对由来已久的投诉,即签订第106条协议会导致延误;引入了国家计划政策框架,以使政府能够以更直接的方式影响计划政策。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Building》 |2015年第45期|40-41|共2页
  • 作者

    Jay Das;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:33:25

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号