首页> 外文期刊>Building and construction law >CPB CONTRACTORS PTY LTD v JKC AUSTRALIA LNG PTY LTD (NO 2)
【24h】

CPB CONTRACTORS PTY LTD v JKC AUSTRALIA LNG PTY LTD (NO 2)

机译:CPB承包商PTY LTD诉JKC澳大利亚液化天然气有限公司(NO 2)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The appellant subcontractor was party to a contract with the respondent head contractor for engineering procurement, construction and commissioning works. The head contractor demanded payment of liquidated damages from the subcontractor arising from late completion of the works. The subcontractor disputed the head contractor's entitlement to the liquidated damages on the basis of the head contractor's assessment of the subcontractor's extension of time claims. The subcontractor applied for an interlocutory injunction preventing the head contractor from seeking recourse to the performance bonds (referred to in the subcontract as Bank Guarantees) provided under the subcontract by the subcontractor, until after the determination of the validity and extent of the subcontractor's extension of time claims.
机译:上诉分包商与被申请人总承包商签订了工程采购,建筑和调试工程合同。总承包商要求承包商分包因工程完工而产生的违约金。分包商根据总承包商对分包商的延期索赔的评估,对总承包商的违约金主张提出异议。分包商提出了一项中间禁令,以防止总承包商寻求分包商根据分包商提供的履约保证金(在分包商中称为银行担保),直到确定分包商的延期有效期和范围。时间索赔。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Building and construction law》 |2018年第5期|343-368|共26页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号