首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >Waiting list management in general practice: a review of orthopaedic patients
【24h】

Waiting list management in general practice: a review of orthopaedic patients

机译:一般实践中的候诊名单管理:骨科患者回顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective-To review all patients on a current general practice orthopaedic waiting list for outpatient appointments with regard to accuracy of the list, clinical priority, and need for further radiological investigation before hospital attendance. Design-Record review by one general practitioner and a radiologist, and discussion with patients of management alternatives. Setting-Six partner city centre urban fund-holding general practice, list size 8651 (29% low deprivation payment status). Subjects-116 adults on an orthopaedic waiting list. Main outcome measures-list accuracy (patient details and status on waiting list); clinical priority (severity of condition); further investigations (results of tests after radiological review). Results-32 patients (28%) were removed from the waiting list because of inaccuracies. 14 patients were considered to be high priority and referred to other hospitals by utilising waiting list initiative funds. Of these patients, five agreed to referral to another hospital (treatment completed on average within three months of rereferral), six did not wish to be rereferred, and two did not attend to discuss the offer and remained on the original waiting list. One prioritised patient had further radiological investigations, was reassured, and was taken off the waiting list. 10 patients had further investigations. These resulted in six patients being referred to other hospitals, three being taken off the waiting list, and one seeking private care. Conclusions-Systematic review of patients on an orthopaedic waiting list of one general practice, though time consuming, led to the identification of inaccuracies in the list and changes in management. Costs need further evaluation, but if the findings occur widely substantial benefits could be achieved for patients.
机译:目的-审查当前就诊的全科骨科候诊名单上的所有患者,以了解名单的准确性,临床优先级以及在就诊之前需要进行进一步放射学检查的情况。由一名全科医生和一名放射科医生进行设计记录审查,并与患者讨论管理替代方案。设置六伙伴城市中心城市的资金持有一般做法,列表大小8651(低剥夺付款状态为29%)。受试者-整形外科等待名单上的116位成年人。主要结果指标列表准确性(患者详细信息和候诊名单上的状态);临床优先级(病情严重程度);进一步检查(放射学检查后的检查结果)。结果-32位患者(28%)由于不准确而被从等待名单中删除。 14名患者被认为是高度优先考虑的,并通过使用等待名单倡议的资金转诊至其他医院。在这些患者中,有五位同意转诊至另一家医院(平均在转诊后三个月内完成治疗),六位不希望转诊,另外两位未参加讨论报价并保留在原始等待名单上。一名优先患者接受了进一步的放射学检查,得到了放心,并被从等待名单中删除。 10名患者进行了进一步的检查。结果导致六名患者被转诊到其他医院,三名被从等待名单中删除,另一名寻求私人护理。结论-对一种常规做法的整形外科等待名单上的患者进行系统复查虽然费时,但却导致发现名单中的不正确之处以及管理方式的变化。费用需要进一步评估,但是如果发现广泛,可以为患者带来可观的收益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号