首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >An economic evaluation of thrombolysis in a remote rural community
【24h】

An economic evaluation of thrombolysis in a remote rural community

机译:偏远农村社区溶栓的经济评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives: To assess the cost effectiveness of community thrombolysis relative to hospital thrombolysis by investigating the extra costs and benefits of a policy of community thrombolysis, then establishing the extra cost per life saved by community thrombolysis. Design: Economic evaluation based on the results of the Grampian region early anistreplase trial. Setting: 29 rural general practices and one secondary care provider in Grampian, Scotland. Subjects: 311 patients recruited to the Grampian region early anistreplase trial. Interventions: Intravenous anistreplase given either by general practitioners or secondary care clinicians. Main outcome measures: Survival at 4 years and costs of administration of thrombolysis. Results: Relative to hospital thrombolysis, community thrombolysis gives an additional probability of survival at 4 years of 11% (95% confidence interval 1% to 22%) at an additional cost of £425 per patient This gives a marginal cost of life saved at 4 years of £3890 (£1990 to £42 820). Conclusions: The cost per life saved by community thrombolysis is modest compared with, for example, the cost of changing the fhrombolytic drug used in hospital from streptokinase to alteplase.
机译:目的:通过调查社区溶栓政策的额外成本和收益,然后确定社区溶栓所挽救的每生命额外成本,来评估社区溶栓相对于医院溶栓的成本效益。设计:根据格兰屏地区早期anrereplase试验的结果进行经济评估。地点:苏格兰格兰屏的29个农村常规诊所和一名二级保健提供者。对象:入选格兰屏地区早期anrereplase试验的311名患者。干预措施:全科医生或二级保健临床医生给予静脉静脉注射止痛药。主要结局指标:4年生存率和溶栓治疗费用。结果:相对于医院溶栓,社区溶栓使4年生存率提高了11%(95%置信区间1%到22%),每位患者需支付425英镑的额外成本。 4年3890英镑(1990英镑至42820英镑)。结论:社区溶栓治疗挽救的每生命成本与将医院使用的溶栓药物从链激酶转变为阿替普酶的成本相比并不算高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号