【24h】

Clinical networks

机译:临床网络

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The NHS seems fond of structural solutions to its problems, even though experience suggests that reorganisation is a distraction, fails to solve the problems it was supposed to address, and creates new ones. Seasoned NHS observers might therefore be sceptical of the growing interest in clinical networks. There are certainly reasons for caution but clinical networks do seem to offer several important advantages to patients and clinicians. The Scottish Office defines managed clinical networks as "linked groups of health professionals and organisations from primary, secondary, and tertiary care working in a co-ordinated manner, unconstrained by existing professional and [organisational] boundaries to ensure equitable provision of high quality effective services." Their report contrasted these with loose networks and suggests that they differ from hub and spoke models in that the interests of the network would dominate those of individual hospitals. These networks may be grouped by function (for example, pathology, emergency medicine, critical care) or client group (children), disease (cancer, renal) or specialty (vascular surgery).
机译:NHS似乎很喜欢针对其问题的结构性解决方案,尽管经验表明重组是一种干扰,无法解决原本应该解决的问题,也创造了新的问题。因此,经验丰富的NHS观察者可能会对临床网络日益增长的兴趣表示怀疑。当然有谨慎的理由,但是临床网络似乎确实为患者和临床医生提供了许多重要的优势。苏格兰办公室将管理型临床网络定义为“由初级,二级和三级护理工作的卫生专业人员和组织组成的相互联系的小组,它们以协调的方式工作,不受现有专业和[组织]边界的限制,以确保公平地提供高质量,有效的服务。”他们的报告将这些与宽松的网络进行了对比,并建议它们与中心和分支模式不同,因为网络的利益将主导各个医院的利益。这些网络可以按功能(例如,病理学,急诊医学,重症监护)或服务​​对象(儿童),疾病(癌症,肾脏)或专科(血管外科)分组。

著录项

  • 来源
    《British Medical Journal》 |2002年第7329期|p.63|共1页
  • 作者

    Nigel Edwards;

  • 作者单位

    NHS Confederation, London SW1E 5ER;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 医药、卫生;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:12:30

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号