首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >Assessment of whether in-hospital mortality for lobectomy is a useful standard for the quality of lung cancer surgery: retrospective study
【24h】

Assessment of whether in-hospital mortality for lobectomy is a useful standard for the quality of lung cancer surgery: retrospective study

机译:评估肺叶切除术的院内死亡率是否是肺癌手术质量的有用标准:回顾性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives To calculate in-hospital mortality after lobectomy for primary lung cancer in the United Kingdom; to explore the validity of using such data to assess the quality of UK thoracic surgeons; and to investigate the relation between in-hospital mortality and the number of procedures performed by surgeons. Design Retrospective study. Setting 36 departments dealing with thoracic surgery in UK hospitals. Participants 4028 patients who had undergone lobectomy for primary lung cancer by one of 102 surgeons. Main outcome measures In-hospital mortality in relation to individual surgeons, among all patients, and among each of five groups of patients defined by the number of operations performed by the surgeon. Results 103 patients (2.6%, 95% confidence interval 2.1% to 3.1%) died after surgery during the same hospital admission. No significant difference was found for in-hospital mortality between the five groups. Conclusions The number of procedures performed by a thoracic surgeon is not related to in-hospital mortality. Reporting data on in-hospital mortality after lobectomy for primary lung cancer is a poor tool for measuring a surgeon's performance.
机译:目的计算英国原发性肺癌肺叶切除术后的住院死亡率;探索使用此类数据评估英国胸外科医师质量的有效性;并调查医院内死亡率与外科医生执行手术的次数之间的关系。设计回顾性研究。在英国医院设有36个处理胸外科的科室。参与者4028名由102位外科医生中的一位接受了原发性肺癌的肺叶切除术的患者。主要结局指标根据所有医生以及五组患者中每组患者与外科医师有关的院内死亡率,由外科医师进行的手术次数确定。结果103例患者(2.6%,95%置信区间2.1%至3.1%)在同一住院期间因手术死亡。五组之间的院内死亡率无显着差异。结论胸外科医师执行的手术数量与院内死亡率无关。报告原发性肺癌的肺叶切除术后住院死亡率的数据对于衡量外科医生的表现是一个很差的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号