首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >Efficacy and tolerability of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors compared with tricyclic antidepressants in depression treated in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Efficacy and tolerability of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors compared with tricyclic antidepressants in depression treated in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:与三环抗抑郁药相比,选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂在初级保健中治疗抑郁症的疗效和耐受性:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective To compare the efficacy and tolerability of tricyclic antidepressants with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in depression in primary care. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Data sources Register of the Cochrane Collaboration's depression, anxiety, and neurosis group. Reference lists of initial studies and other relevant review papers. Selected authors and experts. Selection of studies Studies had to meet minimum requirements on: adequacy of sample size, adequate allocation concealment, clear description of treatment, representative source of subjects, use of diagnostic criteria or clear specification of inclusion criteria, details regarding number and reasons for withdrawal by group, and outcome measures described clearly or use of validated instruments. Main outcome measures Standardised mean difference of final mean depression scores and relative risk of response when using the clinical global impression score. Relative risk of withdrawing from treatment at any time, and the number withdrawing due to side effects. Results 11 studies (2951 participants) compared a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor with a tricyclic antidepressant. Efficacy between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclics did not differ significantly (standardised weighted mean difference, fixed effects 0.07, 95% confidence interval - 0.02 to 0.15; z= 1.59, P < 0.11). Significantly more patients receiving a tricyclic withdrew from treatment (relative risk 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.68 to 0.90; z=3.37, P < 0.0007) and withdrew specifically because of side effects (0.73, 0.60 to 0.88; z=3.24, P < 0.001). Most studies included were small and supported by commercial funding. Many studies were of low methodological quality or did not present adequate data for analysis, or both, and were of short duration, typically six to eight weeks. Conclusion The evidence on the relative efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants in primary care is sparse and of variable quality. The study setting is likely to be an important factor in assessing the efficacy and tolerability of treatment with antidepressant drugs.
机译:目的比较三环类抗抑郁药与选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂在初级保健中对抑郁症的疗效和耐受性。设计对随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。数据来源Cochrane合作组织的抑郁症,焦虑症和神经官能症组的资料。初步研究和其他相关评论文章的参考清单。选定的作者和专家。研究的选择研究必须满足以下最低要求:样本量足够,隐藏适当的分配物,清楚的治疗说明,代表性的受试者来源,诊断标准的使用或纳入标准的明确说明,有关分组退出的数量和原因的详细信息,并清楚描述结果指标或使用经过验证的工具。主要结局指标使用临床总体印象评分时,最终平均抑郁评分的标准化均值差和反应的相对风险。任何时候退出治疗的相对风险,以及因副作用而退出的次数。结果11项研究(2951名参与者)将选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与三环类抗抑郁药进行了比较。选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与三环类药物之间的疗效无显着差异(标准化加权平均差异,固定效应0.07、95%置信区间-0.02至0.15; z = 1.59,P <0.11)。接受三环类药物治疗的患者明显增加(相对危险度0.78,95%置信区间0.68至0.90; z = 3.37,P <0.0007),特别是由于副作用而退出治疗(0.73,0.60至0.88; z = 3.24,P < 0.001)。纳入的大多数研究规模较小,并得到了商业资助。许多研究的方法学质量很低或没有提供足够的数据进行分析,或两者兼而有之,而且研究持续时间短,通常为六至八周。结论选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂和三环类抗抑郁药在初级保健中相对疗效的证据稀少且质量参差不齐。研究设置可能是评估抗抑郁药治疗效果和耐受性的重要因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号