首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Social Work >International Perspectives on the Use of Community Treatment Orders: Implications for Mental Health Social Workers
【24h】

International Perspectives on the Use of Community Treatment Orders: Implications for Mental Health Social Workers

机译:使用社区治疗令的国际观点:对心理健康社会工作者的启示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Substantial changes to mental health law and policy have occurred throughout the Western world during the last decade. The drift towards control, particularly in the form of Community Treatment Orders (CTOs), has profound implications for the role of mental health social workers, yet this issue is rarely discussed in academic literature. This paper seeks to redress this gap in knowledge by examining aspects of law, policy and practice using three case studies: Victoria, Australia; Ontario, Canada; and regions of the UK. The paper begins by critically reviewing selected literature on CTOs, revealing competing claims about efficacy and their impact upon service users1 and practitioners. A discussion of policy and practice contexts in the three jurisdictions is then presented and supported with a typology, to illustrate contrasts and comparisons. In their conclusions, the authors assert that mental health social workers often have a crucial part to play in the implementation of CTOs but that this is not always acknowledged in law and organizational policy. Social workers’ roles and responsibilities need to be more explicitly identified in mental health law. At the same time, there should be a continuing debate about how such coercive powers fit with codes of ethics and practice standards, at national and international levels.
机译:在过去的十年中,整个西方世界对精神卫生法律和政策进行了重大修改。向控制的转变,特别是以社区治疗令(CTO)的形式,对精神卫生社会工作者的作用产生了深远的影响,然而,这个问题在学术文献中很少讨论。本文力图通过以下三个案例研究来研究法律,政策和实践的各个方面,以弥补这一知识差距。加拿大安大略省;和英国的地区。本文从批判性地回顾了有关CTO的精选文献开始,揭示了关于功效及其对服务使用者 1 和从业者的影响的相互竞争的主张。然后,对这三个司法管辖区的政策和实践环境进行了讨论,并通过类型学予以支持,以说明对比。在他们的结论中,作者断言,精神卫生社会工作者通常在CTO的实施中起着至关重要的作用,但这在法律和组织政策中并不总是得到承认。需要在精神卫生法中更明确地确定社会工作者的角色和责任。同时,在国家和国际两级,关于这种强制力如何符合道德规范和实践标准,应该继续进行辩论。

著录项

  • 来源
    《British Journal of Social Work》 |2006年第7期|1101-1118|共18页
  • 作者单位

    Jim Campbell is a Senior Lecturer at the School of Social Work Queens University Belfast Northern Ireland UK. Lisa Brophy is Chief Social Worker at the NorthWest Area Mental Health Service Melbourne Australia and a Ph.D. student at the School of Social Work The University of Melbourne. Bill Healy is an Associate Professor at the School of Social Work and Social Policy LaTrobe University Melbourne and NorthWestern Mental Health Melbourne Australia. Ann Marie O’Brien is Community Treatment Coordinator at the Royal Ottawa Hospital Ontario Canada.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号