【24h】

Recognizing Social Work

机译:认识社会工作

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There has been little interest until recently in the question of whether social work has the characteristics of an academic discipline. This article offers a synopsis of issues arising from a review of social work and social care research funded through the Social Care Institute for Excellence (SCIE). Following a brief scene setting, the first main section of the article gives a synopsis of the social work and social care community’s experience and judgements regarding their engagement with the research council. In the second part of the article, we review relevant policies, structures and trends from an ESRC and social science perspective. We focus on the development of research programmes, followed by an outline of the delivery and implementation of programmes. In the final section, we review the issues, themes and directions that emerged from the project. These include judgements of research relevance, research users, research utilization, the social work contribution to the development of research methods, inter-disciplinary research, the question of whether there are distinctive attributes of social work research, research capacity, career building, priority setting, and the outcomes of social work funding bids. We also reflect on the development and delivery of research programmes, and the implications of the invisibility of social work research within the ESRC. Disciplines within universities are not fixed and abiding realities. ‘Recognizing’ social work is a dynamic, socially negotiated process, shaped by the construction and ordering of knowledge claims within social work and social science communities, and reflecting power differentials that are mediated through structural mechanisms that tend to exclude new ‘claimants’ such as social work. We include a number of recommendations, and suggest ways in which the issues may have relevance beyond the UK.
机译:直到最近,人们对社会工作是否具有一门学科特征的问题几乎没有兴趣。本文概述了由卓越社会关怀学院(SCIE)资助的社会工作和社会关怀研究的回顾所产生的问题。在简短的背景介绍之后,文章的第一节概述了社会工作和社会关怀社区的经验以及对他们与研究委员会的接触做出的判断。在本文的第二部分,我们从ESRC和社会科学的角度回顾了相关的政策,结构和趋势。我们专注于研究方案的制定,然后概述了方案的交付和实施。在最后一节中,我们回顾了项目中出现的问题,主题和方向。这些包括对研究相关性的判断,研究用户,研究利用,社会工作对研究方法发展的贡献,跨学科研究,社会工作研究是否具有独特属性的问题,研究能力,职业建设,优先重点设置,以及社会工作资助竞标的结果。我们还将反思研究计划的制定和实施,以及ESRC内部社会工作研究的隐性影响。大学内部的学科不是固定不变的,而是长期存在的。 “认可”社会工作是一个动态的,经过社会协商的过程,由社会工作和社会科学界内部知识主张的构建和排序所形成,并反映了通过结构性机制介导的权力差异,这些机制倾向于排除新的“主张者”,例如社会工作。我们提供了一些建议,并提出了在英国以外可能与这些问题相关的方式。

著录项

  • 来源
    《British Journal of Social Work》 |2006年第2期|227-246|共20页
  • 作者单位

    Dr Ian Shaw is Professor of Social Work at the University of York England. He is co-editor of the journal Qualitative Social Work. He writes and researches mainly about various aspects of the practice/research interface. He is currently studying the kinds and quality of social work research in UK universities. Dr Hilary Arksey has worked as a Research Fellow in the Social Policy Research Unit at the University of York since 1995. Hilary’s research interests lie in the areas of informal care employment and disability and qualitative research methods. She has recently completed two studies related to carers and is currently working on research funded by the Department for Work and Pensions into carers’ aspirations and decision making around work retirement and pensions. Dr Audrey Mullender is Principal of Ruskin College Oxford and holds a Chair in Social Work at the University of Warwick. She is a member of the Academy of Learned Societies for the Social Sciences and served on the Social Policy and Social Work Panel in the Research Assessment Exercise 2001.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号