首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Social Work >Gaining Satisfaction? An Exploration of Foster-Carers’ Attitudes to Payment
【24h】

Gaining Satisfaction? An Exploration of Foster-Carers’ Attitudes to Payment

机译:获得满意?福斯特护老者的付款态度探究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The payment of foster-carers has long been controversial, reflecting both philosophical debates as to whether fostering should be a voluntaristic or professional activity and concerns about placement provision and service delivery for children. Although many research studies have touched upon the question of foster-carers’ satisfaction with payments, this has not been explored in any depth. Drawing on findings from a study involving 1,181 foster-carers in twenty-one agencies, this article attempts to provide such an analysis with four main objectives. These comprised: examining associations between attitudes towards payment and demographic, socio-economic and fostering career variables; comparing responses between carers based in local authorities (grouped according to levels of payment and performance criteria) and independent agencies (IFAs); gauging the influence of carers’ ‘orientations’ towards foster-care as a ‘professional’ task; and analysing payments in terms of their different components, such as fees, maintenance and certain designated expenses. Among many detailed findings to emerge were the generally low level of satisfaction among local authority carers, especially in comparison with their IFA counterparts and the growing support among carers for salaried status. There was mixed evidence on links between attitudes towards remuneration and the performance of agencies.
机译:长期以来,寄养者的报酬一直是有争议的,既反映了关于寄养是自愿性活动还是专业活动的哲学辩论,也涉及对儿童的安置提供和服务提供的关注。尽管许多研究都涉及寄养人对付款的满意度问题,但尚未对此进行深入探讨。本文根据一项涉及21个机构的1,181名寄养者的研究结果,试图提供具有四个主要目标的分析。其中包括:审查对付款的态度与人口,社会经济和促进职业变量之间的联系;比较地方当局(根据付款水平和绩效标准分组)和独立机构(IFA)之间的照顾者的反应;评估护理人员的“方向”对寄养的影响,这是一项“专业”任务;并根据付款,维护和某些指定的支出等不同组成部分分析付款。在出现的许多详细调查结果中,地方当局的照料者普遍满意度较低,尤其是与IFA同行相比,以及照料者对薪水地位的支持日益增加。关于薪酬态度与机构绩效之间联系的证据不一。

著录项

  • 来源
    《British Journal of Social Work》 |2007年第7期|1205-1224|共20页
  • 作者单位

    Derek Kirton is a Lecturer in Social Policy and Social Work at the University of Kent. Jennifer Beecham is a Reader in Social Policy at the University of Kent and works at the Centre for the Economics of Mental Health at the Institute of Psychiatry. Kate Ogilvie is Performance Manager Bath and North East Somerset Council and was formerly a Research Officer at the University of Kent.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号