...
首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Guidance & Counselling >The CORE-OM intake norms of students attending a South African university counselling service: a comparison with UK counselling service data
【24h】

The CORE-OM intake norms of students attending a South African university counselling service: a comparison with UK counselling service data

机译:参加南非大学咨询服务的学生的CORE-OM入学规范:与英国咨询服务数据的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper provides CORE-OM intake norms for a South African university counselling service, and compares these to the United Kingdom counselling service data reported by Connell, Barkham and Mellor-Clark (2007). The South African norms are very similar to the United Kingdom norms, with no statistical differences in the total or domain scores. There were, however, statistically significant differences in the South African data between black and white clients: black clients report higher total, life functioning and risk scores, indicating greater levels of distress. Black clients are also more likely to present with intake scores above the severe clinical cut-off point, and more likely to report suicidal ideation. It is argued that these differences are the result of the persistent inequalities entrenched during apartheid.
机译:本文提供了南非大学咨询服务的CORE-OM入学标准,并将其与Connell,Barkham和Mellor-Clark(2007)报告的英国咨询服务数据进行了比较。南非规范与英国规范非常相似,总得分或领域得分均无统计学差异。但是,黑人和白人客户之间的南非数据在统计上存在显着差异:黑人客户报告的总体,生活功能和风险评分更高,表明其苦恼程度更高。黑人患者的摄入量分数也可能超过严重的临床临界点,并且更有可能报告自杀意念。有人认为,这些差异是种族隔离期间根深蒂固的持续不平等的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号