首页> 外文期刊>Biomedical signal processing and control >Classifying Alzheimer's disease, Lewy body dementia, and normal controls using 3D texture analysis in magnetic resonance images
【24h】

Classifying Alzheimer's disease, Lewy body dementia, and normal controls using 3D texture analysis in magnetic resonance images

机译:使用3D纹理分析在磁共振图像中对阿尔茨海默氏病,路易体痴呆症和正常对照进行分类

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Dementia is an evolving challenge in society and early intervention is important. The ability to distinguish between different dementia and non-dementia early in course may be essential for successful patient care. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging may aid as a noninvasive method to increase prediction accuracy. In this work we explored the use of two different 3D local binary pattern (LBP) texture features extracted from T1 MR images of the brain combined with a random forest classifier in an attempt to discern patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), Lewy body dementia (LBD), and normal controls (NC). Analysis were conducted in areas with white matter lesions (WML) and normal appearing white matter (NAWM). We also calculated correlations between texture features and cognition measured by mini mental state examination (MMSE) controlling forage. Additionally, two different methods for handling the imbalanced data problem were tested, namely cost-sensitive classification and resampling of the data using the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE). Four different classification tasks were extensively tested, a three-class problem: AD vs. LBD vs. NC, a two-class problem: NC vs. AD, a two-class problem NC vs. LBD, and a two-class problem: AD vs. LBD. Results from 10 folds nested cross validation are reported as mean accuracy, precision, and recall with standard deviation in brackets. The two-class problems NC vs. AD and NC vs. LBD, show encouraging results with total accuracy of 0.97 (0.07) and 0.97 (0.06) respectively. The three-class problem and the two-class problem AD vs. LBD are not equally encouraging but shows higher accuracy than clinical diagnosis with a total accuracy of 0.79 (0.07) and 0.79 (0.15) respectively. Possible explanations may be that the AD- and LBD group are too similar concerning LBP texture analysis and that the LBD group is too small. Most of the texture features calculated for the AD subjects in the NAWM region were significantly correlated with cognition. Together with the positive classification results from the NAWM region this may suggest that the NAWM region is an important area for studying AD. Both cost-sensitive classification and resampling using SMOTE proved useful and improved the results considerably in many of the tests. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:痴呆症是社会中不断发展的挑战,早期干预很重要。在病程早期区分不同痴呆和非痴呆的能力对于成功的患者护理可能至关重要。磁共振成像(MR)可以作为一种非侵入性方法来帮助提高预测准确性。在这项工作中,我们探索了从大脑的T1 MR图像中提取的两个不同的3D局部二进制模式(LBP)纹理特征与随机森林分类器的结合使用,以试图识别患有阿尔茨海默氏病(AD),路易体痴呆( LBD)和正常控件(NC)。在有白质病变(WML)和正常出现白质(NAWM)的区域进行分析。我们还通过控制饲草的小型精神状态检查(MMSE)计算了纹理特征与认知之间的相关性。此外,测试了两种不同的方法来处理不平衡数据问题,即成本敏感的分类和使用合成少数样本过采样技术(SMOTE)进行数据的重新采样。广泛测试了四个不同的分类任务,一个三类问题:AD vs. LBD vs. NC,一个两类问题:NC vs. AD,一个两类问题NC vs. LBD,以及一个两类问题:广告与LBD。嵌套交叉验证的10倍结果报告为平均准确度,精密度和召回度,括号内为标准偏差。 NC与AD和NC与LBD的两类问题显示出令人鼓舞的结果,总精度分别为0.97(0.07)和0.97(0.06)。 AD与LBD的三类问题和两类问题并不那么令人鼓舞,但显示出比临床诊断更高的准确性,总准确性分别为0.79(0.07)和0.79(0.15)。可能的解释可能是,关于LBP纹理分析,AD-和LBD组太相似,而LBD组太小。为NAWM区域中的AD受试者计算的大多数纹理特征与认知显着相关。连同来自NAWM区域的正面分类结果,这可能表明NAWM区域是研究AD的重要领域。成本敏感的分类和使用SMOTE的重采样都证明是有用的,并且在许多测试中都大大改善了结果。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号