首页> 外文期刊>Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers >A cross-culturally standardized set of pictures for younger and older adults: American and Chinese norms for name agreement, concept agreement, and familiarity
【24h】

A cross-culturally standardized set of pictures for younger and older adults: American and Chinese norms for name agreement, concept agreement, and familiarity

机译:一套针对年轻人和老年人的跨文化标准化图片集:关于姓名协议,概念协议和熟悉程度的美国和中国规范

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The present study presents normative measures for 260 line drawings of everyday objects, found in Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980), viewed by individuals in China and the United States. Within each cultural group, name agreement, concept agreement, and familiarity measures were obtained separately for younger adults and older adults. For a subset of 57 pictures (22%), there was equivalence in both name agreement and concept agreement, and for an additional subset of 29 pictures (11%), there was nonequivalent name agreement but equivalent concept agreement, across all culture-by-age groups. The data indicate substantial differences across culture-by-age groups in name agreement percentages and number of distinct name responses provided. We discovered significant differences between older and younger American adults in both name agreement percentages (67 pictures, or 26%) and concept agreement percentages (44 pictures, or 17%). Written naming responses collected for the entire set of Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures showed shifts in both naming and concept agreement percentages over the intervening decades: Although correlations in name agreement were strong (r = .71, p < .001) between our younger American samples and those of Snodgrass and Vanderwart, name agreement percentages have changed for a substantial proportion (33%) of the 260 pictures; moreover, 63% of the stimuli for which Snodgrass and Vanderwart reported concept agreement now appear to differ. We provide comprehensive comparison statistics and tests for both the present study and prior ones, finding differences across numerous item-level measures. The corpus of data suggests that substantial differences in all measures can be found across age as well as culture, so that unequivocal conclusions with respect to cross-cultural or age-related differences in cognition can be made only when appropriate stimuli are selected for studies. Data for all 260 pictures, for each of the four groups, and all supporting materials and tests are freely archived at http;//agingmind.cns.uiuc.edu/Pict_Norms. The full set of these norms may be downloaded from www.psychonomic.org/archive/.
机译:本研究提出了Snodgrass和Vanderwart(1980)中发现的260条日常物体的线图的规范性测量方法,并由中美两国的个人进行了观察。在每个文化群体中,分别针对年轻人和老年人获得了名称协议,概念协议和熟悉度。在所有文化背景下,对于57张图片的子集(22%),名称协议和概念协议都等效;对于另外29张图片的子集(11%),没有等效的名称协议,但概念概念相同-年龄组。数据表明,各个年龄段的文化群体在名称同意百分比和提供的不同名称回复的数量方面存在显着差异。我们发现美国成年人和年轻人之间的名字同意百分比(67张图片,或26%)和概念同意百分比(44张图片,或17%)之间存在显着差异。整个Snodgrass和Vanderwart图片集中收集到的书面命名回答显示,在过去的几十年中,命名和概念一致性百分比均发生了变化:尽管我们在美国较年轻的样本中名称一致性的相关性很强(r = .71,p <.001)和Snodgrass和Vanderwart的图片相比,在260张照片中,名字同意百分比已发生很大变化(33%);此外,Snodgrass和Vanderwart报告的概念协议中的63%刺激现在看来有所不同。我们为当前研究和以前的研究提供了全面的比较统计数据和测试,从而发现了众多项目级指标之间的差异。数据语料表明,在跨年龄和文化的情况下,所有量度均存在实质性差异,因此只有在选择适当的刺激进行研究时,才能得出关于跨文化或与年龄相关的认知差异的明确结论。四组中每组的所有260张图片的数据以及所有支持的材料和测试都免费存储在http; // agingmind.cns.uiuc.edu/Pict_Norms中。这些规范的完整集合可以从www.psychonomic.org/archive/下载。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号