首页> 外文期刊>Axiomathes >On Fundamental Differences between Dependent and Independent Meanings
【24h】

On Fundamental Differences between Dependent and Independent Meanings

机译:从属和独立意义之间的根本差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In “Function and Concept” and “On Concept and Object”, Frege argued that certain differences between dependent and independent meanings were inviolable and “founded deep in the nature of things” but, in those articles, he was not explicit about the actual consequences of violating such differences. However, since by creating a law that permitted one to pass from a concept to its extension, he himself mixed dependent and independent meanings, we are in a position to study some of the actual consequences of his having done so. To make certain of Frege’s ideas about the inviolability of logical form more tangible, I describe a string of very interrelated consequences that his attempt to transform dependent meanings into independent meanings actually brought in its wake.
机译:弗雷格在《功能与概念》和《论概念与客体》中指出,独立意义与独立意义之间的某些差异是不可侵犯的,并且“基于事物的本质而根深蒂固”,但在那些文章中,他并未明确说明其实际后果。违反这种差异。但是,由于他制定了一部允许人们将一个概念从一个概念扩展到其扩展的法律,因此他本人混合了依赖和独立的含义,因此我们有能力研究他这样做的某些实际后果。为了使弗雷格关于逻辑形式的不可侵犯性的观点更加明确,我描述了一系列相互关联的后果,这是他将依赖的意义转化为独立的意义的尝试实际上引起的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号