首页> 外文期刊>Australian Library Journal >Metatextual Conversations: The Exclusion/Inclusion of Genre Fiction in Public Libraries and Social Media Book Groups
【24h】

Metatextual Conversations: The Exclusion/Inclusion of Genre Fiction in Public Libraries and Social Media Book Groups

机译:元文本对话:公共图书馆和社交媒体书组中体裁小说的排除/包含

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Public libraries are institutions with a social inclusion mandate that promote reading and literacies through their collections and programs. Public libraries encourage social inclusion and literary engagement through the provision of book kits for book groups, and apportion cultural legitimacy upon the selections made for these groups of social readers. Using Gerard Genette's schema of transtextualities and through a thematic analysis of NSW public libraries book club kits, reading of literary and 'literary lite' fiction is given a higher status than genre fiction which is predominately excluded from these collections created by librarians who act as gatekeepers and literary authorities. Conversely, book based social media sites such as Goodreads are inclusive of book groups of all genres, from literary to science fiction to romance and many more. The book club selections in these spaces are created by social readers whose engaged digitally captured discussion imparts literary capital through its metatextuality. As the main purpose of book groups is to make commentary upon a selected book, these discussions constitute metatextual conversations. Evidence from the research shows that the physical book group conversations are ephemeral and remain constrained to the physical group, in contrast to the online book group conversation which leaves a perpetual digital document.
机译:公共图书馆是具有社会包容性任务的机构,通过其馆藏和计划促进阅读和文学。公共图书馆通过为书组提供书包来鼓励社会包容和文学参与,并根据为这些社会读者群体的选择分配文化合法性。使用Gerard Genette的跨文本性图式,并通过对新南威尔士州公共图书馆书籍俱乐部工具包的主题分析,文学和“文学精简”小说的阅读地位要比流派小说高,而流派小说则被排除在由作为看门人的图书馆员的收藏中和文学权威。相反,基于书籍的社交媒体网站(如Goodreads)包括从文学到科幻小说到浪漫小说等所有类型的书籍群体。在这些空间中的读书俱乐部选择是由社会读者创建的,他们进行的数字化讨论通过其元文本性赋予了文学资本。由于书组的主要目的是对选定的书进行评论,因此这些讨论构成了超文本对话。该研究的证据表明,与在线书组对话留下永久的数字文档相反,物理书组对话是短暂的,并且仍然局限于物理组。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号