首页> 外文期刊>Australian intellectual property journal >Plain packaging and the TRIPS Agreement: A response to Professor Gervais
【24h】

Plain packaging and the TRIPS Agreement: A response to Professor Gervais

机译:平装和《与贸易有关的知识产权协议》:对格维斯教授的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The legality of Australia's laws on plain packaging of tobacco is currently the subject of complaints to the WTO. This article continues a debate around some key issues that will need to be addressed by the WTO in the process of adjudicating on those complaints. In particular, a key issue will be whether a right to use a trademark can be implied from Art 20 of TRIPS or from the provisions of the Paris Convention that are incorporated into TRIPS. For reasons identified, the article argues that there is no right of use which, in turn, limits the inquiry into exactly which aspects of the plain packaging legislation must be justified within the meaning of Art 20. The article also considers the nature of a justification in the context of the international trademark regime and, finally, raises an issue about the relevance of the Technical Barriers to Trade agreement to plain packaging.
机译:澳大利亚关于烟草无装饰包装的法律的合法性目前是向WTO投诉的主题。本文将继续围绕一些关键问题进行辩论,而这些关键问题在裁决这些投诉过程中将由WTO来解决。特别是,关键问题将是TRIPS第20条或TRIPS纳入的《巴黎公约》条款是否暗含了商标使用权。出于确定的原因,该文章认为没有使用权,反过来又限制了对在第20条含义内必须对无装饰包装立法的哪些方面进行辩护的确切调查。该条还考虑了辩护的性质。在国际商标制度的背景下,最后提出了技术贸易壁垒协议与普通包装的相关性问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号