首页> 外文期刊>Australian Environment Review >Atmospheric trust litigation: a postscript
【24h】

Atmospheric trust litigation: a postscript

机译:大气信托诉讼:附言

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Just months after a Washington State Court ordered the state's environmental agency to promulgate a rule capping and regulating carbon dioxide (CO_2) emissions because "the climate crisis presents an urgent situation that youth petitioners cannot wait on," youth in the US secured another victory for the climate in court. On 10 November 2016, a federal district judge in the State of Oregon issued an unprecedented decision in a constitutional climate rights case brought by 21 young people against the federal government. The decision establishes a fundamental, constitutional right to a climate system capable of sustaining human life. Describing the "groundbreaking" case as "no ordinary lawsuit", Aiken J denied motions to dismiss filed by the federal government and the fossil fuel industry trade associations that intervened in the lawsuit to defend the case alongside the federal government. After discovery, the case will proceed to trial.
机译:在华盛顿州法院下令该州的环保机构颁布一项限制和管制二氧化碳(CO_2)排放量的几个月后,“气候危机带来了青年上访者无法等待的紧急情况”,美国青年赢得了另一项胜利。法庭上的气氛。 2016年11月10日,俄勒冈州的一名联邦地方法官在21名年轻人针对联邦政府提起的宪法气候权利案中做出了前所未有的裁决。该决定确立了能够维持人类生命的气候系统的基本宪法权利。 Aiken J将“具有开创性”的案件描述为“没有普通诉讼”,否认了联邦政府和干预诉讼以与联邦政府一起为该案进行辩护的化石燃料行业协会提起的动议。一经发现,该案将继续审理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号