首页> 外文期刊>Auditing >Engagement Quality Reviews: A Comparison of Audit Firm Practices
【24h】

Engagement Quality Reviews: A Comparison of Audit Firm Practices

机译:参与质量审核:审计事务所实践的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Engagement quality (concurring partner) review is an important part of the audit review process. It is one quality control mechanism used by public accounting firms to monitor the quality of audit engagements. The engagement quality reviewer serves as an evaluator of the performance of the engagement partner and engagement team. Concerns about the effectiveness of existing firm concurring partner review practices have led to increased partner sanctions imposed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In addition, Section 103 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 directs the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) to develop an auditing standard on engagement quality review. This practice note reports on an analysis of six major firms' written guidance and practice aids for engagement quality review. Our comparison of the firms' guidance shows some differences in the assignment of engagement quality reviewer, the participation of the engagement quality reviewer in audit planning, the extensiveness of practice aids, and the involvement of engagement quality reviewer during the course of audit engagements. Lastly, we identify a number of research questions and practice implications.
机译:参与质量(并发合作伙伴)审核是审核审核过程的重要组成部分。它是公共会计师事务所用来监视审计业务质量的一种质量控制机制。敬业度审核员是敬业度合作伙伴和敬业度团队绩效的评估者。对现有公司同意进行合作伙伴审核的有效性的担忧导致美国证券交易委员会(SEC)加大了对合作伙伴的制裁力度。此外,2002年《萨班斯-奥克斯利法案》第103条指示上市公司会计监督委员会(PCAOB)制定参与质量审核的审核标准。本实践报告报告了对六家主要公司的书面质量指南和实践辅助工具的分析,以进行参与质量审查。我们对公司指导的比较表明,在聘用质量审核员的分配,聘用质量审核员在审计计划中的参与,实践辅助的广泛性​​以及在聘用质量审核员在审计聘用过程中的参与度方面存在一些差异。最后,我们确定了许多研究问题和实践意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号