首页> 外文学位 >Investigating the effects of post-audit review salience on auditor judgments: A comparative analysis of audit planning and reporting decisions resulting from PCAOB inspections and internal quality reviews.
【24h】

Investigating the effects of post-audit review salience on auditor judgments: A comparative analysis of audit planning and reporting decisions resulting from PCAOB inspections and internal quality reviews.

机译:调查审核后审核显着性对审核员判断的影响:对PCAOB检查和内部质量审核产生的审核计划和报告决策的比较分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper reports the results of a study investigating the effects of PCAOB inspection (Inspection) and internal quality review (IQR) salience on auditors' audit planning and reporting decisions. To investigate these judgments, 48 auditors participated in a 1 x 3 between-subjects experiment in which the salience of a post-audit review is manipulated as Inspection salient, IQR salient, or no post-audit review is salient. Manipulating post-audit reviews salience is justified using the results of Stefaniak and Houston (2009), which suggest 63 (62) percent of their audit partners can or try to anticipate the engagements that will be selected for IQR (Inspection). Using the Houston, Peters, & Pratt (2005) model, I predict that auditors will assess higher audit fees in conditions where a post-audit review is salient. Using extant accounting research on the influence of accountability (DeZoort, Harrison, & Taylor, 2006) and sanctions (Shafer, Morris, & Ketchand, 1999), I also predict that auditors will make more conservative judgments in conditions where a post-audit review is salient. While I do not find auditors were more conservative in their judgments, I do find that post-audit review salience significantly increases audit fees. Furthermore, post-audit review salience significantly increased perceived litigation risk, overall client riskiness, substantive testing efforts, and budgeted hours, as well as significantly decreased the perceived financial condition of the client. This study is important for several reasons. First, it provides initial evidence as to the impacts of IQRs on auditor planning decisions, a quality review mechanism thus far not considered in the accounting literature. Second, it provides initial evidence and understanding of whether, and how, auditors pass post-audit review costs along to their clients.
机译:本文报告了一项研究结果,该研究结果调查了PCAOB检查(Inspection)和内部质量评审(IQR)显着性对审计师的审计计划和报告决策的影响。为了调查这些判断,有48位审计员参加了一个1 x 3主题间实验,其中操纵了审计后评审的显着性为“检查重点”,“ IQR重点”,或者没有审计后评审的显着性。 Stefaniak和Houston(2009)的结果证明了操纵审计后的审查显着性是合理的,这表明他们63%(62)的审计合作伙伴可以或试图预测将被选为IQR(检查)的项目。我使用Houston,Peters,&Pratt(2005)模型预测,在审计后审查很重要的情况下,审计师将评估更高的审计费用。利用现存的会计研究来研究问责制的影响(DeZoort,Harrison和Taylor,2006年)和制裁的影响(Shafer,Morris和Ketchand,1999年),我还预测审计师会在审计后审查的情况下做出更为保守的判断。很明显。虽然我发现审计师的判断没有更加保守,但我确实发现审计后的审查显着性显着增加了审计费用。此外,审计后的审查显着性显着增加了诉讼风险,总体客户风险,实质性测试工作和预算时间,并且显着降低了客户的财务状况。这项研究很重要,原因有几个。首先,它提供了有关IQR对审计师计划决策的影响的初步证据,这是迄今为止会计文献中尚未考虑的质量审查机制。其次,它提供了初步的证据和对审计师是否以及如何将审计后审核费用传递给客户的理解。

著录项

  • 作者

    Stefaniak, Chad Matthew.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Alabama.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Alabama.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Accounting.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 113 p.
  • 总页数 113
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 财务管理、经济核算;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:37:54

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号